Texts in Conversation
In Genesis 40, Joseph tells two imprisoned officials that interpreting dreams belongs to God, then explains what their dreams mean. Daniel follows this same pattern as Daniel credits God who reveals mysteries in the king’s dream.
Share:
2500 BCE
1000+ CE
Genesis 40:8
Hebrew Bible
7 So he asked Pharaoh’s officials, who were with him in custody in his master’s house, “Why do you look so sad today?” 8 They told him, “We both had dreams, but there is no one to interpret them.” Joseph responded, “Don’t interpretations belong to God? Tell them to me.” 9 So the chief cupbearer told his dream to Joseph: “In my dream, there was a vine in front of me.
Daniel 2:28
Hebrew Bible
27 Daniel replied to the king, “The mystery that the king is asking about is such that no wise men, astrologers, magicians, or diviners can possibly disclose it to the king. 28 However, there is a God in heaven who reveals mysteries, and he has made known to King Nebuchadnezzar what will happen in the times to come. The dream and the visions you had while lying on your bed are as follows: 29 “As for you, O king, while you were in your bed your thoughts turned to future things. The revealer of mysteries has made known to you what will take place.
Search:
Notes and References
“... All three foreign kings call for their wise men and magicians to interpret their dreams or visions, but the native professionals are unsuccessful (Genesis 41:8; Daniel 2:2–13a, 27; 5:7–8). The visions and their interpretations are only revealed by means of an Israelite or Judahite youth, exiled from his homeland. In each case, an individual in the royal service introduces the Israelite/Judahite exile to the king – the cupbearer in Genesis 40–41; Arioch the chief executioner in Daniel 2:14, 25; and the queen mother in 5:10–12. The foreign youth is brought speedily before the king (Genesis 41:14; Daniel 2:25) and successfully interprets the king’s dream or vision, an action described employing the terminus technicus פתר/פשר, a root found either in verbal or nominal forms only in Genesis 40–41 and Daniel 2–7. Each dream not only has implications for the king himself, but also has repercussions for the entire kingdom. The protagonist insists that his interpretive gifts are based neither on his own abilities, nor on any techniques that he has learned or acquired; rather, God has revealed this wisdom to him (Genesis 40:8; 41:16; Daniel 2:28). ...”
Segal, Michael
Dreams, Riddles, and Visions: Textual, Contextual, and Intertextual Approaches to the Book of Daniel
(p. 49) De Gruyter, 2016
* The use of references are not endorsements of their contents. Please read the entirety of the provided reference(s) to understand the author's full intentions regarding the use of these texts.
Your Feedback:
Leave a Comment
Anonymous comments are welcome. All comments are subject to moderation.