<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <atom:link href="https://intertextual.bible/rss/articles" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <title><![CDATA[intertextual.bible - Articles]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[https://intertextual.bible/rss/articles]]></link>
        
        <description><![CDATA[Articles and insights about biblical intertextuality from intertextual.bible]]></description>
        <language>en-US</language>
        <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 01:55:22 +0000</pubDate>

                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Three Ways Two Texts Can Be Related]]></title>
                <link>https://intertextual.bible/article/three-ways-two-texts-can-be-related</link>
                <description><![CDATA[When two texts share the same language, there are three ways to explain it. The first used the second, the second used the first, or both drew on an earlier source. Examples from Jude and 2 Peter, the Gospels, and the flood story show how to tell these apart and why the answer changes what the shared passage means.]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[intertextual.bible]]></author>
                <guid>https://intertextual.bible/article/three-ways-two-texts-can-be-related</guid>
                <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 15:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Intertextuality Resolves Problems and Creates New Ones]]></title>
                <link>https://intertextual.bible/article/intertextuality-resolves-problems-and-creates-new-ones</link>
                <description><![CDATA[Comparing biblical texts with their sources can resolve long-standing puzzles, from the meaning of Genesis 6 to the Greek behind Matthew's account of the virgin birth, yet each solution moves the difficulty rather than removing it.]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[intertextual.bible]]></author>
                <guid>https://intertextual.bible/article/intertextuality-resolves-problems-and-creates-new-ones</guid>
                <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 01:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Borrowing Authority from Established Texts]]></title>
                <link>https://intertextual.bible/article/borrowing-authority-from-established-texts</link>
                <description><![CDATA[In the ancient world authority belonged to what was established, and writers grounded new claims in familiar texts. Citation, allusion, attribution to venerable figures, and the rewriting of received narratives all worked to draw credibility from recognized traditions.]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[intertextual.bible]]></author>
                <guid>https://intertextual.bible/article/borrowing-authority-from-established-texts</guid>
                <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 01:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Every Text Is a Snapshot of a Developing Tradition]]></title>
                <link>https://intertextual.bible/article/every-text-is-a-snapshot-of-a-developing-tradition</link>
                <description><![CDATA[A written text may feel like a permanent, unchanging thing, but the biblical texts reflect centuries of theological and literary development. A text captures one moment of a tradition that was developing before it was written and kept developing afterward.]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[intertextual.bible]]></author>
                <guid>https://intertextual.bible/article/every-text-is-a-snapshot-of-a-developing-tradition</guid>
                <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 01:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Critical Is Not Criticism]]></title>
                <link>https://intertextual.bible/article/critical-is-not-criticism</link>
                <description><![CDATA[In biblical studies the word "criticism" does not mean finding fault with the text or attacking scripture. It derives from a Greek verb meaning to judge, decide, or evaluate, and it names a disciplined practice of careful, rule-governed reading whose aim is to thoughtfully examine texts and the traditions behind them.]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[intertextual.bible]]></author>
                <guid>https://intertextual.bible/article/critical-is-not-criticism</guid>
                <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 01:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Be Wary of Sensationalism]]></title>
                <link>https://intertextual.bible/article/be-wary-of-sensationalism</link>
                <description><![CDATA[Texts like 1 Enoch and the Greek Isaiah are full of cosmic monsters and mythological creatures. These reflect the cosmology and culture of the people who wrote them, not suppressed images of a hidden reality.]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[intertextual.bible]]></author>
                <guid>https://intertextual.bible/article/be-wary-of-sensationalism</guid>
                <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 01:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Reading the Final Form and Reading Its History]]></title>
                <link>https://intertextual.bible/article/reading-the-final-form-and-reading-its-history</link>
                <description><![CDATA[Texts provide different meanings depending on whether they are read as a finished whole or as the end of a long process of writing and revision. The choice between synchronic and diachronic reading determines what an interpreter prioritizes, and familiar texts make that choice especially easy to overlook.]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[intertextual.bible]]></author>
                <guid>https://intertextual.bible/article/reading-the-final-form-and-reading-its-history</guid>
                <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 01:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Be Wary of Minimalism and Maximalism]]></title>
                <link>https://intertextual.bible/article/be-wary-of-minimalism-and-maximalism</link>
                <description><![CDATA[Readers encountering texts such as 1 Enoch, the Dead Sea Scrolls, or ancient Near Eastern literature for the first time often respond in one of two ways. Some dismiss them as irrelevant or threatening to traditional belief and confessional boundaries, while some uncritically embrace them almost conspiratorially, as if they provide hidden or suppressed meaning. A historical, evidence based approach accepts these texts as useful and influential without either extreme.]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[intertextual.bible]]></author>
                <guid>https://intertextual.bible/article/be-wary-of-minimalism-and-maximalism</guid>
                <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 01:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[How Biblical Authors Identified Their Quotations]]></title>
                <link>https://intertextual.bible/article/how-ancient-authors-marked-their-quotations</link>
                <description><![CDATA[Most intertextual connections between texts are subtle, but writers in antiquity also had a more direct technique. Citation formulas such as "as it is written" and "as it is said" identify a source openly and indicate how the citing author wants it read. The patterns differ across Second Temple Jewish, New Testament, and rabbinic traditions in ways that reveal how each community understood its relationship to inherited scripture.]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[intertextual.bible]]></author>
                <guid>https://intertextual.bible/article/how-ancient-authors-marked-their-quotations</guid>
                <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 01:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Intertextuality and Parallelomania]]></title>
                <link>https://intertextual.bible/article/intertextuality-and-parallelomania</link>
                <description><![CDATA[In 1962, Samuel Sandmel warned biblical scholars against "parallelomania," the tendency to overdo similarities between texts and assume direct literary dependence where none exists. His critique was effective, perhaps too effective, as some scholars began avoiding comparative work altogether, a reaction that has been called "parallelophobia." Intertextual methodology offers a disciplined path between these extremes, providing criteria for evaluating textual relationships without either exaggerating or ignoring them.]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[intertextual.bible]]></author>
                <guid>https://intertextual.bible/article/intertextuality-and-parallelomania</guid>
                <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 01:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Biblical Texts Require the Tools of Historiography]]></title>
                <link>https://intertextual.bible/article/biblical-texts-require-the-tools-of-historiography</link>
                <description><![CDATA[Literary connections between the Bible and other ancient texts show that these documents follow the same patterns as other ancient writing, which means they require the same critical tools that historians apply to any ancient source.]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[intertextual.bible]]></author>
                <guid>https://intertextual.bible/article/biblical-texts-require-the-tools-of-historiography</guid>
                <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 01:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Intertextuality Rewards Imaginative Reading]]></title>
                <link>https://intertextual.bible/article/intertextuality-rewards-imaginative-reading</link>
                <description><![CDATA[Imaginative reading is not a modern imposition on ancient texts. Biblical authors themselves read earlier scriptures creatively, reshaping earlier passages to serve new theological purposes, and intertextuality as a discipline shows why the rigid opposition between exegesis and eisegesis fails to account for how texts actually work.]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[intertextual.bible]]></author>
                <guid>https://intertextual.bible/article/intertextuality-rewards-imaginative-reading</guid>
                <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 01:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Intertextuality and Rewritten Scripture]]></title>
                <link>https://intertextual.bible/article/intertextuality-and-rewritten-scripture</link>
                <description><![CDATA[The concept of Rewritten Scripture describes texts that retell and transform earlier scriptural material through continuous rewriting. While it overlaps with intertextuality, recent scholarship has questioned whether the category holds together as a genre, revealing deeper issues about how ancient authors related to their literary predecessors.]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[intertextual.bible]]></author>
                <guid>https://intertextual.bible/article/intertextuality-and-rewritten-scripture</guid>
                <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 01:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Intertextuality and Inner-Biblical Exegesis]]></title>
                <link>https://intertextual.bible/article/intertextuality-and-inner-biblical-exegesis</link>
                <description><![CDATA[Inner-biblical exegesis and intertextuality both deal with relationships between texts, but they ask different questions and operate under different assumptions about how those relationships work.]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[intertextual.bible]]></author>
                <guid>https://intertextual.bible/article/intertextuality-and-inner-biblical-exegesis</guid>
                <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 01:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Intertextuality and Scripturalized Narrative]]></title>
                <link>https://intertextual.bible/article/intertextuality-and-scripturalized-narrative</link>
                <description><![CDATA[Scripturalized narrative, the practice of composing new stories using the language and patterns of earlier scriptures, represents one of the most widespread forms of intertextuality in ancient Jewish and Christian literature.]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[intertextual.bible]]></author>
                <guid>https://intertextual.bible/article/intertextuality-and-scripturalized-narrative</guid>
                <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 01:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[The Pseudepigrapha and the Biblical Literary World]]></title>
                <link>https://intertextual.bible/article/the-pseudepigrapha-and-the-biblical-literary-world</link>
                <description><![CDATA[The texts known as the Pseudepigrapha were not originally received as marginal writings outside the biblical tradition. They participated in the same literary conversation, engaged with the same narratives and theological questions, and contributed ideas and frameworks that shaped later writings, including the New Testament. Reading them as part of the same literary world offers a more accurate account of how ancient Jewish and early Christian literature developed.]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[intertextual.bible]]></author>
                <guid>https://intertextual.bible/article/the-pseudepigrapha-and-the-biblical-literary-world</guid>
                <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 01:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[The Significance of the Differences Between Text Traditions]]></title>
                <link>https://intertextual.bible/article/the-significance-of-the-differences-between-text-traditions</link>
                <description><![CDATA[Intertextuality is often associated with finding similarities between texts, but some of the most revealing connections emerge when traditions deliberately diverge. The Septuagint, the Targums, and Rewritten Bible texts like Jubilees preserve versions of biblical narratives that differ from the Hebrew in ways that expose the theological and literary priorities of their communities. These differences are not errors or corruptions but interpretive choices that tell their own story.]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[intertextual.bible]]></author>
                <guid>https://intertextual.bible/article/the-significance-of-the-differences-between-text-traditions</guid>
                <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 01:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Intertextuality and Reception History]]></title>
                <link>https://intertextual.bible/article/intertextuality-and-reception-history</link>
                <description><![CDATA[When later texts deliberately rework earlier ones, the choices they make, what they preserve, alter, or recontextualize, reveal how their communities read and understand the source material. The connection of intertextuality and reception history is traceable through texts and traditions that span thousands of years, from the earliest literature of the ancient Near East through texts such as the Hebrew Bible, the Dead Sea Scrolls, the New Testament, and Rabbinic texts, among others. At each stage, new compositions engage inherited texts in ways that document how those texts are received, making the history of reading inseparable from the history of writing.]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[intertextual.bible]]></author>
                <guid>https://intertextual.bible/article/intertextuality-and-reception-history</guid>
                <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 01:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Intertextuality does not Require Literary Dependence]]></title>
                <link>https://intertextual.bible/article/intertextuality-does-not-require-literary-dependence</link>
                <description><![CDATA[Literary relationships and connections don't require one author to have directly read another's earlier work. Ideas often spread through tradition, cultural memory, shared practices, and community exchange. This means intertextuality can be historically grounded without proving direct literary dependence, and reader-perceived connections gain depth when supported by evidence of shared cultural currents.]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[intertextual.bible]]></author>
                <guid>https://intertextual.bible/article/intertextuality-does-not-require-literary-dependence</guid>
                <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 01:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Synchronic and Diachronic Reading]]></title>
                <link>https://intertextual.bible/article/synchronic-and-diachronic-reading</link>
                <description><![CDATA[Reading involves many choices and ways of approaching a text. Meaning can come from how a text works as a whole in its present form and from how it relates to other texts across time. These approaches often overlap, especially in common traditions, helping to shape how intertextual connections are recognized and interpreted.]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[intertextual.bible]]></author>
                <guid>https://intertextual.bible/article/synchronic-and-diachronic-reading</guid>
                <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2026 06:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Pre-Masoretic Hebrew Tradition]]></title>
                <link>https://intertextual.bible/article/pre-masoretic-hebrew-texts</link>
                <description><![CDATA[The Hebrew Bible was preserved through several overlapping text traditions rather than one fixed or uniform text. The Masoretic Text represents a later standardized version, while the Septuagint, the Samaritan Pentateuch, and the Dead Sea Scrolls preserve different readings that reflect earlier stages of an underlying Hebrew tradition. These traditions do not always agree, showing that multiple Hebrew versions circulated at the same time and reading them together makes it easier to understand how later Jewish, Christian, and Samaritan interpretations developed from this diverse history.]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[intertextual.bible]]></author>
                <guid>https://intertextual.bible/article/pre-masoretic-hebrew-texts</guid>
                <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 01:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Exploring Intertextuality with B.J. Oropeza]]></title>
                <link>https://intertextual.bible/article/exploring-intertextuality-with-bj-oropeza</link>
                <description><![CDATA[Professor B.J. Oropeza, a professor of biblical studies at Azusa Pacific University, introduces intertextuality as the study of how texts influence one another, thereby transforming meaning during interpretation. He asserts that this approach in biblical studies must expand beyond simple scriptural connections to include the Hellenistic, Greco-Roman, and Rabbinic contexts, which were crucial for New Testament authors like Paul to effectively communicate with their original audiences.]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[intertextual.bible]]></author>
                <guid>https://intertextual.bible/article/exploring-intertextuality-with-bj-oropeza</guid>
                <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 01:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Texts in Conversation]]></title>
                <link>https://intertextual.bible/article/texts-in-conversation</link>
                <description><![CDATA[Every text inherits details from earlier voices, cultural influences, common ideas. By placing these texts next to each other in conversation, it becomes easier to see how they reshape and reorient their meaning as traditions move forward.]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[intertextual.bible]]></author>
                <guid>https://intertextual.bible/article/texts-in-conversation</guid>
                <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 01:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[The Reader and the Author in Intertextuality]]></title>
                <link>https://intertextual.bible/article/the-reader-and-the-author-in-intertextuality</link>
                <description><![CDATA[Intertextuality studies how biblical texts draw meaning from other texts. Some approaches focus on readers and how they notice patterns, others trace how authors reworked earlier writings. Both approaches are found in Jewish and Christian traditions, including the New Testament, Philo, and later Rabbinic interpretations.]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[intertextual.bible]]></author>
                <guid>https://intertextual.bible/article/the-reader-and-the-author-in-intertextuality</guid>
                <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 01:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[What is Intertextuality?]]></title>
                <link>https://intertextual.bible/article/what-is-intertextuality</link>
                <description><![CDATA[Intertextuality studies how texts connect to and draw meaning from other texts, a concept developed by literary theorist Julia Kristeva. The idea began to be used in biblical studies, where scholars debated whether to focus on the reader’s associations or the author’s intended sources. That discussion continues today as the method is applied not only to traditional biblical texts but also to related writings such as the Dead Sea Scrolls and other Second Temple literature.]]></description>
                <author><![CDATA[intertextual.bible]]></author>
                <guid>https://intertextual.bible/article/what-is-intertextuality</guid>
                <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 01:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
                            </item>
            </channel>
</rss>
