Texts in Conversation

2 John defines the antichrist as anyone who refuses to confess that Jesus has come in the flesh. The early Christian theologian Polycarp repeats this formula very closely in his letter to the Philippians.
Share:
2500 BCE
1000+ CE

2 John 1:7

New Testament
6 (Now this is love: that we walk according to his commandments.) This is the commandment, just as you have heard from the beginning; thus you should walk in it. 7 For many deceivers have gone out into the world, people who do not confess Jesus as Christ coming in the flesh. This person is the deceiver and the antichrist! 8 Watch out, so that you do not lose the things we have worked for, but receive a full reward.
Date: 90-100 C.E. (based on scholarly estimates)

Polycarp Epistle to the Philippians 7:1

Early Christian
1 For every one who shall not confess that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh, is antichrist: and whosoever shall not confess the testimony of the Cross, is of the devil; and whosoever shall pervert the oracles of the Lord to his own lusts and say that there is neither resurrection nor judgment, that man is the firstborn of Satan. 2 Wherefore let us forsake the vain doing of the many and their false teachings, and turn unto the word which was delivered unto us from the beginning, being sober unto prayer and constant in fastings, entreating the all-seeing God with supplications that He bring us not into temptation, according as the Lord said, The Spirit is indeed willing, but the flesh is weak.
Date: 135-155 C.E. (based on scholarly estimates)
Search:

Notes and References

#5614
“... Let us notice the probable Johannine allusions. First, as is fairly widely admitted, Polycarp’s statement of the first confessional problem involves a direct conflation of 1 John 4: 2-3 and 2 John 7, whether this was intentional or not. It is interesting to note that, like Polycarp, Irenaeus uses 2 John 7 and 1 John 4: 2-3 together, citing them formally in Against Heresies 3. 16. 8. Second, in the next clause, confessing the testimony of the cross, may go back to 1 John 5: 6-8, which speak of a testimony of the water and the blood. But this is itself dependent upon the account in John 19: 34-5, which speaks of a testimony in relation to the cross. That this text lies behind Polycarp’s phrase is made more likely by a passage in Irenaeus. Irenaeus specifically points to John 19: 34-5 when dealing with the docetic heresy of Marcion in Against Heresies 4. 33. 2 ...”
Hill, Charles E. The Johannine Corpus in the Early Church (p. 419) Oxford University Press, 2004

* The use of references are not endorsements of their contents. Please read the entirety of the provided reference(s) to understand the author's full intentions regarding the use of these texts.

Your Feedback:

Leave a Comment

Do you have questions or comments about these texts? Please submit them here.

Anonymous comments are welcome. All comments are subject to moderation.

Glossary

Go to Intertext