Whoever resolves to love God, and to love his neighbor as himself, not according to man but according to God, is on account of this love said to be of a good will; and this is in Scripture more commonly called charity, but it is also, even in the same books, called love. For the apostle says that the man to be elected as a ruler of the people must be a lover of good. And when the Lord Himself had asked Peter, “Have you a regard for me (diligis) more than these?” Peter replied, “Lord, You know that I love (amo) You.” And again a second time the Lord asked not whether Peter loved (amaret) Him, but whether he had a regard (diligeret) for Him, and he again answered, “Lord, You know that I love (amo) You.” But at the third questioning the Lord Himself no longer says, “Have you a regard (diligis) for me,” but “Do you love (amas) me?” And then the evangelist adds, Peter was grieved because He said to him the third time, “Do you love (amas) me?” though the Lord had not said three times but only once, “Do you love (amas) me?” and twice “Diligis me?” from which we gather that, even when the Lord said “diligis,” He used an equivalent for “amas.” Peter, too, throughout used one word for the one thing, and the third time also replied, “Lord, You know all things, You know that I love (amo) You.” I have judged it right to mention this, because some are of the opinion that charity or regard (dilectio) is one thing, love (amor) another. They say that dilectio is used of a good affection, amor of an evil love. But it is very certain that even secular literature knows no such distinction. However, it is for the philosophers to determine whether and how they differ, though their own writings sufficiently testify that they set great store by love (amor) placed on good objects, and even on God Himself. But we wished to show that the Scriptures of our religion, whose authority we prefer to all other writings, make no distinction between amor, dilectio, and caritas; and we have already shown that amor is used in a good sense. And if anyone imagines that amor is no doubt used both of good and bad loves, but that dilectio is reserved for the good only, let him remember what the psalm says, “Whoever loves (diligit) iniquity hates his own soul;” and the words of the Apostle John, “If anyone loves (diligere) the world, the love (dilectio) of the Father is not in him.” 1 John 2:15 Here you have in one passage dilectio used both in a good and a bad sense. And if anyone asks for an instance of amor being used in a bad sense (for we have already shown its use in a good sense), let him read the words, “For men will be lovers (amantes) of themselves, lovers (amatores) of money.” 2 Timothy 3:2 The right will is, therefore, well-directed love, and the wrong will is ill-directed love. Love, then, yearning to have what is loved, is desire; and having and enjoying it, is joy; fleeing what is opposed to it, it is fear; and feeling what is opposed to it, when it has happened to it, is sadness. Now these motions are evil if the love is evil; good if the love is good. Let us prove what we assert from Scripture. The apostle “desires to depart, and to be with Christ.” Philippians 1:23 And, “My soul desired to long for Your judgments;” or if it is more appropriate to say, “My soul longed to desire Your judgments.” And, “The desire of wisdom brings to a kingdom.”⁠a Yet it has always been the usage to understand desire and concupiscence in a bad sense if the object is not specified. But joy is used in a good sense: “Be glad in the Lord, and rejoice, you righteous.” And, “You have put gladness in my heart.” And, “You will fill me with joy with Your countenance.” Fear is used in a good sense by the apostle when he says, “Work out your salvation with fear and trembling.” Philippians 2:12 And, “Do not be high-minded, but fear.” Romans 11:20 And, “I fear that somehow, as the serpent deceived Eve by his cunning, so your minds may be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ.” 2 Corinthians 11:3 But with respect to sadness, which Cicero prefers to call sickness (œgritudo), and Virgil pain (dolor) (as he says, “Dolent gaudentque”), but which I prefer to call sorrow, because sickness and pain are more commonly used to express bodily suffering — with respect to this emotion, I say, the question whether it can be used in a good sense is more difficult.