Texts in Conversation
Leviticus extends the restriction on selling royal grants in Hammurabi's laws to all land belonging to God. This gives Israel's families a continuing claim to their land, rather than reserving protection for those holding a king's grant.
Share:
2500 BCE
1000+ CE
Code of Hammurabi 1:60
Babylonian Legal Text
Ancient Near East
34 If a captain or a sergeant takes a soldier's belongings, wrongs a soldier, hires a soldier out, hands a soldier over to a powerful man in a lawsuit, or takes a gift that the king gave to a soldier, the captain or sergeant shall be put to death. 35 If anyone buys from an officer the cattle or sheep which the king gave him, he loses his money. 36 The field, garden, and house of an officer, a soldier, or a state tenant cannot be sold. 37 If anyone buys the field, garden, or house of an officer, a soldier, or a state tenant, his sales contract tablet shall be broken and declared invalid, and he loses his money. The field, garden, and house return to their owners.
Leviticus 25:23
Hebrew Bible
19 “‘The land will give its fruit, and you may eat until you are satisfied, and you may live securely in the land. 20 If you say, “What will we eat in the seventh year if we do not sow and gather our produce?” 21 I will command my blessing for you in the sixth year so that it may yield the produce for three years, 22 and you may sow the eighth year and eat from that sixth year’s produce—old produce. Until you bring in the ninth year’s produce, you may eat old produce. 23 The land must not be sold without reclaim because the land belongs to me, for you are foreign residents, temporary settlers, with me. 24 In all your landed property you must provide for the right of redemption of the land.
Search:
Notes and References
“... 25:23. God as owner of land compared to temple economy. All of the land occupied by the Israelites was the property of *Yahweh. It was granted to them as tenants, and as such they could not sell it outright to anyone. In the Jubilee year (every fiftieth year), all land that had been consigned for payment of debts was to be returned to its owners. If a man died, it was the responsibility of his nearest kin to redeem the land so that it would remain in the family (25:24-25; Jer 32:6-15). This concept is similar to that found in Egypt, where the “divine” Pharaoh owned the land and granted it to his subjects. However, it stands in contrast with the temple economy that existed in Mesopotamia. There land was owned by individual citizens, the king and the temples of the various gods. The laws of *Hammurabi speak of the king’s land grants, which could revert to him upon the death of the vassal. The land owned by the temples was granted to tenants, who paid a portion of their harvest for the right to work the land. This patchwork of ownership, while depending in many cases on tenants who could not sell the land, did not provide the sense of unity implied in the biblical concept. ...”
Walton, John H.
The IVP Bible Background Commentary: Old Testament
(p. 139) InterVarsity Press, 2000
* The use of references are not endorsements of their contents. Please read the entirety of the provided reference(s) to understand the author's full intentions regarding the use of these texts.
Your Feedback:
Leave a Comment
Anonymous comments are welcome. All comments are subject to moderation.
1 && show(index - 1)"
@keydown.right.window="open && comments.length > 1 && show(index + 1)">
User Comments
,