Texts in Conversation

Ezekiel describes Jerusalem’s siege by Babylon with sacrificial language by echoing the gesture of placing a hand on an offering from Leviticus. The city, expected to be protected, ironically becomes the offering itself.
Share:
2500 BCE
1000+ CE

Leviticus 4:24

Hebrew Bible
23 or his sin that he committed is made known to him, he must bring a flawless male goat as his offering. 24 He must lay his hand on the head of the male goat and slaughter it in the place where the burnt offering is slaughtered before the Lord—it is a sin offering. 25 Then the priest must take some of the blood of the sin offering with his finger and put it on the horns of the altar of burnt offering, and he must pour out the rest of its blood at the base of the altar of burnt offering.
Date: 5th Century B.C.E. (Final composition) (based on scholarly estimates)

Ezekiel 24:2

Hebrew Bible
1 The Lord’s message came to me in the ninth year, in the tenth month, on the tenth day of the month: 2 “Son of man, write down the name of this day, this very day. The king of Babylon has laid siege to Jerusalem this very day. 3 Recite a proverb to this rebellious house and say to them, ‘This is what the Sovereign Lord says: “‘Set on the pot, set it on, pour water in it too; 4 add the pieces of meat to it, every good piece, the thigh and the shoulder; fill it with choice bones.
Date: 6th Century B.C.E. (based on scholarly estimates)
Search:

Notes and References

#5413
"... Clues to Ezekiel’s intent to create irony appear even before verse 6. The first colon of the parable uses the verbal form שפת (“set” the pot on the fire) that sounds just like שפט (“judge” the pot). The noun מבחר (“choicest”) appears twice (verses 4, 5), and conjures the thought of the people’s arrogance about their election (בחר, Exodus 20:5). By verse 5 the song specifies that a choice animal is being butchered, “the choicest of the flock,” presumably for a fellowship-offering meal in the temple courts. Resonances with the familiar metaphor of Israel itself as a holy flock will echo in some ears (see Ezekiel 34:1–16; 36:37–38; 1 Kings 1:17; Psalm 23:1–4; 74:1; 79:13; 95:7; 100:3). By the end of the song, irony begins to spark as to a possible new, incongruous meaning emerges. Ezekiel’s audience itself is the meal being cooked! God’s protection of the holy flock is actually not indiscriminate. Nebuchadnezzar has “laid” siege to Jerusalem (סמך, 24:2), just as one “lays” one’s hand (סמך) on the head of a sacrificial animal in Zion’s courts (Leviticus 1:4; 3:2, 8, 13; 4:24). The siege will turn the city into a fiery temple stovetop boiling a lamb ..."

* The use of references are not endorsements of their contents. Please read the entirety of the provided reference(s) to understand the author's full intentions regarding the use of these texts.

Your Feedback:

Leave a Comment

Do you have questions or comments about these texts? Please submit them here.

Anonymous comments are welcome. All comments are subject to moderation.

Find Similar Texts

Search by the same Books

Search by the same Reference

Compare the same Books

Compare the same Text Groups

Go to Intertext