Texts in Conversation

Revelation describes the dead judged by what is written in heavenly books. The Testament of Abraham describes the same courtroom in detail, with angels writing down deeds and a judge who orders a book opened to find people's sins.
Share:
2500 BCE
1000+ CE

Revelation 20:12

New Testament
11 Then I saw a large white throne and the one who was seated on it; the earth and the heaven fled from his presence, and no place was found for them. 12 And I saw the dead, the great and the small, standing before the throne. Then books were opened, and another book was opened—the book of life. So the dead were judged by what was written in the books, according to their deeds. 13 The sea gave up the dead that were in it, and Death and Hades gave up the dead that were in them, and each one was judged according to his deeds.
Date: 92-96 C.E. (based on scholarly estimates)

Testament of Abraham 12:6

Pseudepigrapha
5 The marvelous man who sat on the throne judged and sentenced the souls himself, and the two angels on the right and on the left wrote down the record, the one on the right the righteousness and the one on the left the wickedness. The one in front of the table, who held the balance, weighed the souls, and the fiery angel, who held the fire, tested the souls. Abraham asked the chief-captain Michael: What is this that we are seeing? The chief-captain said: These things that you see, holy Abraham, are the judgment and the repayment. 6 Then the angel holding the soul in his hand brought it before the judge, and the judge said to one of the angels who served him: Open this book for me, and find me the sins of this soul. Opening the book, he found its sins and its righteous deeds equally balanced, and he gave it neither to the tormentors nor to those who were saved, but set it in the middle.
Date: 100 C.E. (based on scholarly estimates)
Search:

Notes and References

#6175
... The multiplication of books in Revelation 20:12 troubled Augustine, who interpreted the book of life as the “commandments each man had kept or not kept. If we imagine this book to be a book in the literal sense, who could measure its size or length? How much time would it take to read a book in which the whole life of each man is written? Will there be as many angels as men at the last judgment, so that every man will hear his life recited by the angel assigned to him? In that case, therefore, there would not be one book for all lives, but one for each. However, the Scripture wishes us to take it as one book. It says, ‘another book was opened’. We must therefore understand this book to signify a certain divine power, by which it will be made possible for every man to recall to memory all his own works, both good and evil, and for the mind to review them all with miraculous speed, so that each man’s knowledge will accuse or excuse his conscience, and thus all and each will be judged simultaneously. And this divine power is no doubt called a ‘book’ because we shall as it were read in it all that it causes us to remember.” The City of God against the Pagans, 20:14 (translated by R. W. Dyson; Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), 999. Augustine’s reflections on the sheer size required of a book of judgment are reminiscent of the enormous book in Testament of Abraham Recension A, while the way Augustine expresses books’ tight connections with memory brings to mind the function of the book of sins in Testament of Abraham Recension B. ...

* The use of references are not endorsements of their contents. Please read the entirety of the provided reference(s) to understand the author's full intentions regarding the use of these texts.

Your Feedback:

Leave a Comment

Do you have questions or comments about these texts? Please submit them here.

Anonymous comments are welcome. All comments are subject to moderation.

Find Similar Texts

Glossary

Go to Intertext

Thank you!

We appreciate your feedback.

Got a moment for a quick survey?

This website has good content
Strongly disagree Strongly agree
This website is easy to use
Strongly disagree Strongly agree