Texts in Conversation
Exodus 14 shares the Baal Cycle's defeat of Sea through dried waters, making the sea crossing a divine victory that frees people from a human king.
Share:
2500 BCE
1000+ CE
KTU 1.2 IV:31
Cuneiform Texts from Ugarit
Ancient Near East
like a falcon from his fingers. Strike the skull of Prince Yamm (Ocean), the brow of Ruler Nahar (River)! Let Yamm collapse in a heap, and let him fall to the ground!' Then the mace leapt from the hand of Baal, like a falcon from his fingers. It struck the skull of Prince Yamm, the brow of Ruler Nahar. Yamm collapsed in a heap; he fell to the ground. His joints trembled, and his visage was discomposed. Baal gathered Up and drank Prince Yamm to the dregs, he exterminated Ruler Nahar. By name Athtart chided him Dry him Up, O Valiant Baal! Dry him up, O Charioteer of the Clouds! For our captive is Prince [Yamm], [for] our captive is Ruler Nahar. And […] goes out […] Valiant Baal dries him up, and […] Yamm is surely dead! Baal shall [reign]
Exodus 14:21
Hebrew Bible
21 Moses stretched out his hand toward the sea, and the Lord drove the sea apart by a strong east wind all that night, and he made the sea into dry land, and the water was divided. 22 So the Israelites went through the middle of the sea on dry ground, the water forming a wall for them on their right and on their left. 23 The Egyptians chased them and followed them into the middle of the sea—all the horses of Pharaoh, his chariots, and his horsemen. 24 In the morning watch the Lord looked down on the Egyptian army through the pillar of fire and cloud, and he threw the Egyptian army into a panic. 25 He jammed the wheels of their chariots so that they had difficulty driving, and the Egyptians said, “Let’s flee from Israel, for the Lord fights for them against Egypt!”
Search:
Notes and References
“... Many writers have noted the great frequency with which the combat myth
is described or alluded to in the Hebrew Bible.98 While it would be wrong to
claim that the biblical narratives derive immediately from the Ugaritic one,
it is unquestionable that they are joint heirs to one West Semitic strand of
the tradition. Both end up with the victor claiming a patrimony described
as his “inheritance”99 and they share many significant items of vocabulary,
as detailed →in Table 2 below.100 The real significance of these terms is not
just their usage across the divide between Ugaritic and Hebrew literature,
suggesting a cognate relationship (which spreads more widely across
diverse recensions of the tradition), but also their capacity, as key poetic
terms, to evoke the trope even when they are used in isolation, as in some
cases instanced here.101 These points of contact are too numerous to claim
that any similarity is superficial and inconsequential. They are evidently
organically linked. ...” “... b. ybṯ, ybš,
ḥrb, “dry
up”:103
KTU 1.2 iv
29 (ybṯ),
31 (ybṯ)
Isa 50:2 (ḥrb), Jer 51:36 (ḥrb), Nah 1:4 (ybš), Josh 2:10 (ybš) etc., Ps
74:15 (ybš), Isa 42:15 (ybš), 44:27 (ḥrb, ybš), Zech 10:11 (ybš), Exod
14:21 (ḥrb), Isa 44:27 (ḥrb). ...”
* The use of references are not endorsements of their contents. Please read the entirety of the provided reference(s) to understand the author's full intentions regarding the use of these texts.
Your Feedback:
Leave a Comment
Anonymous comments are welcome. All comments are subject to moderation.
1 && show(index - 1)"
@keydown.right.window="open && comments.length > 1 && show(index + 1)">
User Comments
,