Texts in Conversation
Daniel 10 and 2 Enoch 1 describe heavenly beings that shine like stars with eyes that glow like fire, rooted in the ancient extramission theory of vision, where the eyes create their own light.
Share:
2500 BCE
1000+ CE
Daniel 10:6
Hebrew Bible
5 I looked up and saw a man clothed in linen; around his waist was a belt made of gold from Ufaz. 6 His body resembled yellow jasper, and his face had an appearance like lightning. His eyes were like blazing torches; his arms and feet had the gleam of polished bronze. His voice thundered forth like the sound of a large crowd. 7 Only I, Daniel, saw the vision; the men who were with me did not see it. On the contrary, they were overcome with fright and ran away to hide.
2 Enoch 1:5
Secrets of Enoch
Pseudepigrapha, Apocalypses
4 And there appeared to me two men, exceeding big, so that I never saw such on earth; 5 their faces were shining like the sun, their eyes too were like a burning light, and from their lips was fire coming forth with clothing and singing of various kinds in appearance purple, their wings were brighter than gold, their hands whiter than snow. They were standing at the head of my couch and began to call me by my name.
Search:
Notes and References
"... Allison argues that ancient Jewish writers thought of the eye as functioning in the same way as the sun; thus, just as heavenly sources of light could become dimmed, so also the light of the eyes could be darkened. He maintains that they 'presuppose that the normal eye produces a subtle ray or light'. The difficulty with these examples is that many can be read in purely figurative or metaphorical terms. Against this potential objection, Allison posits a number of later noncanonical texts where the extramission theory is more plausible (e.g., 1 Enoch 106:2, 11). (Allison also compares this to the motif of fire coming forth from human and divine eyes, such as 2 Enoch 1:5; Daniel 10:6; Revelation 1:14, 2:18, 19:12; 3 Enoch 9:4; 18:25; 25:2-3. We should be careful in our dealings with passages describing the eyes of divine beings, particularly those in heavenly locations. Allison argues that these passages indicate that 'the normal eye produces a subtle ray or light, and that under the right circumstances or with exceptional individuals or supernatural beings such as angels, this light or ray can become intense and visible, even destructive') ..."
Moss, Candida R.
Blurred Vision and Ethical Confusion: The Rhetorical Function of Matthew 6:22-23
(pp. 757-776) The Catholic Bible Quarterly, 2011
* The use of references are not endorsements of their contents. Please read the entirety of the provided reference(s) to understand the author's full intentions regarding the use of these texts.
Your Feedback:
Leave a Comment
Anonymous comments are welcome. All comments are subject to moderation.
1 && show(index - 1)"
@keydown.right.window="open && comments.length > 1 && show(index + 1)">
User Comments
,