Go to Related Reading
About this book

City of God, Book 14

On the City of God Against the Pagans

About this book
Chapter 3

But if anyone says that the flesh is the cause of all vices and bad conduct, since the soul lives wickedly only because it is moved by the flesh, it is certain he has not carefully considered the whole nature of man. For “the corruptible body, indeed, weighs down the soul.”⁠ For this reason, too, the apostle, speaking of this corruptible body, of which he had shortly before said, “though our outward man is perishing,” 2 Corinthians 4:16 says, “We know that if our earthly house of this tabernacle were dissolved, we have a building from God, a house not made with hands, eternal in the heavens. For in this we groan, earnestly desiring to put on over it our house which is from heaven: if indeed, being clothed, we shall not be found naked. For we who are in this tabernacle groan, being burdened: not because we wish to be unclothed, but further clothed, so that mortality might be swallowed up in life.” 2 Corinthians 5:1-4 We are then burdened with this corruptible body; but knowing that the cause of this burdensomeness is not the nature and substance of the body, but its corruption, we do not desire to be deprived of the body, but to be clothed with its immortality. For then, also, there will be a body, but it will no longer be a burden, being no longer corruptible. For now, then, “the corruptible body presses down the soul, and the earthly tabernacle weighs down the mind that muses on many things,” nevertheless those are in error who suppose that all the evils of the soul come from the body. Virgil, indeed, seems to express the views of Plato in the beautiful lines, where he says — A fiery strength inspires their lives, / An essence that from heaven derives, / Though clogged in part by limbs of clay / And the dull 'vesture of decay;' / but though he goes on to mention the four most common mental emotions — desire, fear, joy, sorrow — with the intention of showing that the body is the origin of all sins and vices, saying — / Hence wild desires and grovelling fears, / And human laughter, human tears, / Immured in dungeon-seeming nights / They look abroad, yet see no light, yet we believe quite otherwise. For the corruption of the body, which weighs down the soul, is not the cause but the punishment of the first sin; and it was not the corruptible flesh that made the soul sinful, but the sinful soul that made the flesh corruptible. And though from this corruption of the flesh there arise certain incitements to vice, and indeed vicious desires, yet we must not attribute to the flesh all the vices of a wicked life, or we would clear the devil of all these, for he has no flesh. For though we cannot call the devil a fornicator or drunkard, or ascribe to him any sensual indulgence (though he is the secret instigator and prompter of those who sin in these ways), yet he is exceedingly proud and envious. And this viciousness has so possessed him, that on account of it he is reserved in chains of darkness to everlasting punishment. Now these vices, which have dominion over the devil, the apostle attributes to the flesh, which the devil certainly does not have. For he says “hatred, discord, jealousy, strife, envy” are the works of the flesh; and of all these evils pride is the origin and head, and it rules in the devil though he has no flesh. For who shows more hatred to the saints? Who is more at variance with them? Who more envious, bitter, and jealous? And since he exhibits all these works, though he has no flesh, how are they works of the flesh, if not because they are the works of man, who is, as I said, spoken of under the name of flesh? For it is not by having flesh, which the devil does not have, but by living according to himself — that is, according to man — that man became like the devil. For the devil too, wished to live according to himself when he did not remain in the truth; so that when he lied, this came not from God, but from himself, who is not only a liar, but the father of lies, since he was the first who lied, and the originator of lying as of sin.

Book 15

Texts in conversation

Compare Wisdom of Solomon 9:15 and Augustine, City of God 14.3

Deuterocanon · Early Christian

Share:

Summary

The Christian theologian Augustine uses the Wisdom of Solomon as an authoritative source of teaching, incorporating its reflection on human frailty and the limits of understanding in the City of God.

Passages

Wisdom of Solomon 9:15

Deuterocanon
13 For what man will know the counsel of God? Or who will conceive what the Lord wills? 14 For the thoughts of mortals are unstable, and our plans are prone to fail. 15 For a corruptible body weighs down the soul. The earthy tent burdens a mind that is full of cares. 16 We can hardly guess the things that are on earth, and we find the things that are close at hand with labor; but who has traced out the things that are in the heavens? 17 Who gained knowledge of your counsel, unless you gave wisdom, and sent your holy spirit from on high?
50 BCE – 50 CE (scholarly estimate) Read in the Wisdom of Solomon

Augustine, City of God 14.3

Early Christian · On the City of God Against the Pagans
But if anyone says that the flesh is the cause of all vices and bad conduct, since the soul lives wickedly only because it is moved by the flesh, it is certain he has not carefully considered the whole nature of man. For “the corruptible body, indeed, weighs down the soul.” For this reason, too, the apostle, speaking of this corruptible body, of which he had shortly before said, “though our outward man is perishing,” 2 Corinthians 4:16 says, “We know that if our earthly house of this tabernacle were dissolved, we have a building from God, a house not made with hands, eternal in the heavens. For in this we groan, earnestly desiring to put on over it our house which is from heaven: if indeed, being clothed, we shall not be found naked.
426 CE (scholarly estimate) Read in Augustine, City of God 14

References

"... In affirming the canonicity of the two ‘Solomonic’ books not written by Solomon, Augustine says of Wisdom and Sirach “the Church especially in the West has accepted them as authoritative from antiquity”; City of God 17.20). A survey of patristic comments on the liturgical use of what Rufinus called the ecclesiastical books bears out Augustine’s geographical distinction. Eastern sources restrict the liturgical use of documents to the books of the Jewish canon. Cyril of Jerusalem (Catechesis 4.36–38) emphatically asserts that only the 22 books accepted by the Jews find a place in Christian liturgy, and he advises catechumens to maintain this standard in their private reading. Athanasius (Festal Letters 39) assigns the ecclesiastical books the role of elementary instruction in the faith, as do the Apostolic Canons (canon 85); this position seems to discount their use in the liturgy. The Council of Laodicea is more explicit; in the same context in which it limits the OT canon to 22 books ... However, the matter stood differently among Latin writers: Jerome, Rufinus, and Augustine all affirm that the ecclesiastical books are used in the corporate worship of the Church ... if the Church reads a ‘scriptural’ book, it is a canonical book. Similarly, Augustine responds to the objection of some that the Book of Wisdom is not canonical by arguing that its employment in the liturgy implies its divine authority ..."
Edmon L. Gallagher, Hebrew Scripture in Patristic Biblical Theory: Canon, Language, Text, VCSup 114 (Leiden: Brill, 2012), 54–55.

References are not endorsements of their contents. Read each reference in full to understand its author's intentions in using these texts.

Your feedback

Wisdom of Solomon 9:15 and Augustine, City of God 14.3

Leave a comment

Your questions and comments are welcome!

Comments

Glossary

Search the Library