Go to Related Reading
About this book

Discourse Against the Arians, Book 2

About this book
Chapter 49

And from the visible creation we clearly see that His invisible things too, 'being perceived through the things that are made,' are not independent of one another; for it was not first one and then another, but all were established at once according to their kind. For the Apostle did not count them individually, so as to say 'whether Angel, or Throne, or Dominion, or Authority,' but he mentions all together according to their kind, 'whether Angels, or Archangels, or Principalities'; for this is how the creatures originate. If, then, as I have said, the Word were a creature, He must have been brought into being not first of them, but with all the other Powers, however much He surpasses the rest in glory. For this is how we find it to be in their case: they came to be at once, with neither first nor second, and they differ from one another in glory, some on the right of the throne, some all around, and some on the left, but all alike praising and standing in service before the Lord. Therefore, if the Word were a creature, He would not be first or the beginning of the rest; yet if He is before all, as indeed He is, and is Himself alone First and Son, it does not follow that He is the beginning of all things as to His Essence, for what is the beginning of all is counted among all. And if He is not such a beginning, then neither is He a creature; it is very plain that He differs in essence and nature from the creatures and is other than they, and is the Likeness and Image of the sole and true God, being sole Himself too. So He is not classed with creatures in Scripture; rather, David rebukes those who dare even to think of Him as such, saying, 'Who among the gods is like the Lord?' and 'Who is like the Lord among the sons of God?' and Baruch, 'This is our God, and no other shall be compared with Him.'⁠ For the One creates, and the rest are created; and the One is the very Word and Wisdom of the Father's Essence, and through this Word the things that came to be, which did not exist before, were made.

Book 3

Texts in conversation

Compare Baruch 3:35 and Athanasius, Discourse Against the Arians 2 49:1

Deuterocanon · Early Christian

Share:

Summary

The Christian theologian Athanasius echoes Baruch’s language that no one can be compared to God, using it as an authoritative source in a theological argument against those who diminish divine uniqueness.

Passages

Baruch 3:35

Deuterocanon
33 It is he who sends forth the light, and it goes. He called it, and it obeyed him with fear. 34 The stars shone in their watches, and were glad. When he called them, they said, “Here we are.” They shone with gladness to him who made them. 35 This is our God. No other can be compared to him. 36 He has found out all the way of knowledge, and has given it to Jacob his servant and to Israel who is loved by him. 37 Afterward she appeared upon earth, and lived with men.
200–50 BCE (scholarly estimate) Read in Baruch

Athanasius, Discourse Against the Arians 2 49:1

Early Christian
Word were a creature, He would not be first or the beginning of the rest; yet if He is before all, as indeed He is, and is Himself alone First and Son, it does not follow that He is the beginning of all things as to His Essence, for what is the beginning of all is counted among all. And if He is not such a beginning, then neither is He a creature; it is very plain that He differs in essence and nature from the creatures and is other than they, and is the Likeness and Image of the sole and true God, being sole Himself too. So He is not classed with creatures in Scripture; rather, David rebukes those who dare even to think of Him as such, saying, 'Who among the gods is like the Lord?' and 'Who is like the Lord among the sons of God?' and Baruch, 'This is our God, and no other shall be compared with Him.' For the One creates, and the rest are created; and the One is the very Word and Wisdom of the Father's Essence, and through this Word the things that came to be, which did not exist before, were made.

References

"... The figure of Baruch is associated with the Syriac Apocalypse of Baruch (2 Baruch), the Greek Apocalypse of Baruch (3 Baruch), and the Paraleipomena Jeremiou (4 Baruch). Baruch is not mentioned in the New Testament or Apostolic Fathers, even with regard to the incarnate wisdom motif in 3.38 (compare John 1:14; Romans 8:3; Hebrews 2:14), although Baruch does appear in canon lists from the fourth century (Athanasius, Ep. Fest. 39; Cyril of Jerusalem, Cat. 4.35; Epiphanius, Pan. 8.6.1-4). Early Jewish and Christian writings assign Baruch uncertain prophetic status. The Masoretes saw Baruch as Jeremiah’s scribe (e.g., Jeremiah 36:27, 32) and the Byzantine Vitae Prophetarum excludes Baruch. Yet the earliest quotation from Baruch (Athenagorus, Leg. 9) names Baruch as a prophet, and some authority is suggested where Optatus of Milevis appeals to Baruch in a church controversy (Against the Donatists 7.1). With regard to biblical theology, Baruch has received some attention as to the ethical system offered by its exegesis of sin, exile, and repentance (Harrington, Invitation, p. 93; see also Harlow, Greek, p. 168; Wright, Baruch, pp. 113–21) ..."
Daniel Ryan, “Baruch,” in The T&T Clark Companion to the Septuagint, ed. James K. Aitken, Bloomsbury Companions (London: Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2015), 487–499.

References are not endorsements of their contents. Read each reference in full to understand its author's intentions in using these texts.

Tags

Your feedback

Baruch 3:35 and Athanasius, Discourse Against the Arians 2 49:1

Leave a comment

Your questions and comments are welcome!

Comments

Glossary

Search the Library