Texts in Conversation

Paul in 1 Corinthians links women covering their heads in prayer to creation and the presence of angels. Genesis Rabbah also ties creation to the roles of man and woman, showing how gender and worship practices were shaped by similar traditions.
Share:
2500 BCE
1000+ CE

1 Corinthians 11:10

New Testament
5 But any woman who prays or prophesies with her head uncovered disgraces her head, for it is one and the same thing as having a shaved head. 6 For if a woman will not cover her head, she should cut off her hair. But if it is disgraceful for a woman to have her hair cut off or her head shaved, she should cover her head. 7 For a man should not have his head covered, since he is the image and glory of God. But the woman is the glory of the man. 8 For man did not come from woman, but woman from man. 9 Neither was man created for the sake of woman, but woman for man. 10 For this reason a woman should have a symbol of authority on her head, because of the angels. 11 In any case, in the Lord woman is not independent of man, nor is man independent of woman.
Date: 55-57 C.E. (based on scholarly estimates)

Genesis Rabbah 8:8

Aggadah
Rabbinic
Rabbi Shmuel bar Naḥman said in the name of Rabbi Yonatan: When Moses was writing the Torah, and was writing what was made on each day, when he reached this verse: “And God said: Let us make Man in our image, in our likeness” – he said before Him: ‘Master of the universe, why do you provide the heretics with basis for a claim? This is bewildering.’ He said to him: ‘Just write, and if someone wants to err, let him err.’ The Holy One blessed be He said to Moses: ‘Is it not so regarding this man whom I created, that I will bring forth descendants of greater and lesser status? If someone of greater status is about to seek approval from one of lesser stature than he, but he says: Why do I need to seek approval from one who is of lesser stature than I? One may say to him: Learn from your Creator, as He created the heavenly realms and the earthly realms, but when He came to create man, he consulted with the ministering angels.’ Rabbi Levi said: There is no consultation here; rather, this is analogous to a king who was strolling at the entrance to his palace, and saw a large hewn rock set off to the side. He said: ‘What should we use this for?’ Some of them [of his advisers] said: ‘[Use it for] the public baths,’ and others said: ‘For private bathhouses.’ The king said: ‘I am going to craft it into a statue.’ Who will prevent it? The heretics once asked Rabbi Samlai: ‘How many deities created the world?’ He said to them: ‘Let you and I inquire into the early days.’ That is what is written: “For inquire now into the early days that were before you, from the day that God created [bara] man” (Deuteronomy 4:32) – “that [God] baru” is not written here, but rather, “that [God] bara.” They said to him: ‘What is this that is written: “In the beginning God [Elohim] created”?’ He said to them: “Baru Elohim” is not written here, but rather, “bara Elohim.” Rabbi Samlai said [moreover]: Everywhere you find a basis for a claim of the heretics, you find a refutation alongside it. They asked him further, saying to him: ‘What is this that is written: “Let us make Man in our image, in our likeness”?’ He said to them: ‘Read what is written thereafter: God created [vayivre’u] man in their image is not stated, but rather, “God created [vayivra] man in His image,”’ (Genesis 1:27). After they left, his students said to him: ‘Rabbi, those men you pushed off with a reed. What would you respond to us?’ He said to them: ‘In the past, Adam was created from earth and Eve was created from Adam. From now on, “In our image, in our likeness” – a man will not [produce offspring] without a woman, nor will a woman without a man, nor both of them without the Divine Presence.’ They then asked him, they said to him: ‘What is this that is written: “God [El], God [Elohim], the Lord [Hashem], [He knows]…”’ (Joshua 22:22). He said to them: ‘“They know” is not written here, but rather, “He knows.”’ His students said to him: ‘Those men you pushed off with a reed. What do you respond to us?’ He said to them: ‘All three of them are names of God, as when a person says: Basilias Augustus Caesar.’ They [the heretics] asked him: ‘What is this that is written: “For He is a holy [kedoshim] God”?’ (Joshua 24:19). He said to them: ‘“They are holy” is not written, but rather, “he is holy.”’
Date: 500 C.E. (based on scholarly estimates)
Search:

Notes and References

#955
"... It may be added here that other positive statements concerning women in the NT are paralleled in Jewish literature: the injunction to equality in conjugal rights in 1 Cor 7,1-5 is paralleled, e.g., in the Mishnah, Ket 5,7 (on Ex 21,10); and the exercise of prophecy by women in 1 Cor 11,5 is paralleled, of course, in the story of Deborah, Judges 4,4. The question arises whether these parallels could have existed in Judaism as early as NT times, and so have been known to the writers of the NT. It should be made clear that positive proof of their existence in pre-Christian or primitive Christian times is not available. The dating problem that is present in all considerations of the rabbinic parallels to the NT is present in this case, too. The fact is that the rabbinic materials, which contain many parallels to the NT, were not put into writing until the end of the second century. The general opinion of scholars at the present time is that much of the material may have circulated orally a century or two earlier and have been received by the NT writers from the rabbinic tradition, although it is hardly ever possible to demonstrate that this was so in a particular case ... The Genesis Rabbah, a late fifth- or early sixth-century compilation, ascribes the passage to two rabbis who lived ca. 250 and ca. 135 respectively. If the ascriptions are correct, the parallel existed in oral form in the early second century ..."
Boucher, Madeleine Some Unexplored Parallels to 1 Cor 11,11-12 and Gal 3,28: The NT on the Role of Women (pp. 50-58) The Catholic Biblical Quarterly, Vol. 31, No. 1, 1969

* The use of references are not endorsements of their contents. Please read the entirety of the provided reference(s) to understand the author's full intentions regarding the use of these texts.

Your Feedback:

User Comments

Leave a Comment

Do you have questions or comments about these texts? Please submit them here.

Anonymous comments are welcome. All comments are subject to moderation.

Find Similar Texts

Search by the same Books

Search by the same Reference

Compare the same Text Groups

Glossary

Go to Intertext

Thank you!

We appreciate your feedback.

Got a moment for a quick survey?

This website has good content
Strongly disagree Strongly agree
This website is easy to use
Strongly disagree Strongly agree