Texts in Conversation

The Letter of Aristeas mocks people who worship statues of inventors turned into gods, using a Greek theory that the gods were once famous humans. Wisdom of Solomon 14 also traces idols to honored humans, a dead child and a distant king.
Share:
2500 BCE
1000+ CE

Letter of Aristeas 1:137

Letter of Aristeas to Philocrates
Pseudepigrapha, Hebrew Bible Expansions
they have clear proof that they possess no feeling. For it would be utterly foolish to suppose that anyone became a god by virtue of his inventions. For the inventors simply took certain objects already created and by combining them together, showed that they possessed a fresh utility: they did not themselves create the substance of the thing, and so it is a vain and foolish thing for people to make gods of men like themselves. For in our times there are many who are much more inventive and much more learned than the men of former days who have been deified, and yet they would never come to worship them. The makers and authors of these myths think that they are
Date: 200-150 B.C.E. (based on scholarly estimates)

Wisdom of Solomon 14:15

Deuterocanon
15 For a father worn with untimely grief, making an image of the child quickly taken away, now honored him as a god which was then a dead human being, and delivered to those that were under him mysteries and solemn rites. 16 Afterward the ungodly custom, in process of time grown strong, was kept as a law, and the engraved images received worship by the commandments of princes. 17 And when men could not honor them in presence because they lived far off, imagining the likeness from afar, they made a visible image of the king whom they honored, that by their zeal they might flatter the absent as if present.
Date: 100-50 B.C.E. (based on scholarly estimates)
Search:

Notes and References

#7394
“... Two different explanations are adduced for its origins. The first, based to some extent on a widespread religious phenomenon of the Greco-Roman world, refers to a father, who, stricken with grief for the untimely death of his child, sets up an image of it to be accorded divine honors. The second refers to the statues of rulers whose beauty has been enhanced by skillful artists intent on flattery, and subsequently become objects of divine worship by the masses. [...] Although they are somewhat reminiscent of Euhemerus' theory of the origin of the gods [expounded in his Hiera Anagraphe or Sacred Record, ca. 300 BCE], which held that Uranus, Cronus, and Zeus had been great kings in their day who were later worshiped as gods by their grateful subjects, they do not derive directly from it, but probably from a later "Euhemeristic" source (see NOTE on v. 15 below), for the author of Wisd is more narrowly interested in explaining the origins of idolatry, whereas Euhemerus was concerned with the larger question regarding the origins of the gods of Greek mythology. [...] A more direct use of Euhemerus' theory by Jewish writers, on the other hand, may be found in the so-called Letter of Aristeas and in the Sibylline Oracles. ...”

* The use of references are not endorsements of their contents. Please read the entirety of the provided reference(s) to understand the author's full intentions regarding the use of these texts.

Your Feedback:

Leave a Comment

Do you have questions or comments about these texts? Please submit them here.

Anonymous comments are welcome. All comments are subject to moderation.

User Comments

,

Find Similar Texts

Go to Intertext