Texts in Conversation

In 1 Clement, the author says Jesus came from Jacob as concerning the flesh, the phrase Paul uses in Romans for the descent of Jesus from Israel. It interrupts a list of priests and kings, so it may have been added later by a copyist who knew Romans.
Share:
2500 BCE
1000+ CE

Romans 9:5

New Testament
1 I am telling the truth in Christ (I am not lying!), for my conscience assures me in the Holy Spirit— 2 I have great sorrow and unceasing anguish in my heart. 3 For I could wish that I myself were accursed—cut off from Christ—for the sake of my people, my fellow countrymen, 4 who are Israelites. To them belong the adoption as sons, the glory, the covenants, the giving of the law, the temple worship, and the promises. 5 To them belong the patriarchs, and from them, by human descent, came the Christ, who is God over all, blessed forever! Amen. 6 It is not as though the word of God had failed. For not all those who are descended from Israel are truly Israel,
Date: 55-58 C.E. (based on scholarly estimates)

Clement of Rome, 1 Clement 32:2

First Epistle of Clement to the Corinthians
Early Christian
1 If any man will consider them one by one in sincerity, he shall understand the magnificence of the gifts that are given by Him. 2 For of Jacob are all the priests and levites who minister to the altar of God; of him is the Lord Jesus as concerning the flesh; of him are kings and rulers and governors in the line of Judah; yes and the rest of his tribes are held in no small honor, seeing that God promised saying, “Your seed shall be as the stars of heaven.” 3 They all therefore were glorified and magnified, not through themselves or their own works or the righteous doing which they performed, but through His will.
Date: 90-100 C.E. (based on scholarly estimates)
Search:

Notes and References

#7241
“... This passage may reflect dependence on Romans, but it is difficult to be certain. As the Oxford Committee observes, the phrase ‘κατὰ σάρκα’ is ‘not a very obvious one’. It is part of an idiom in Clement (ὁ κύριος Ἰησοῦς τὸ κατὰ σάρκα) that corresponds almost exactly with Paul’s ὁ Χριστὸς τὸ κατὰ σάρκα, but appears to disrupt the sense of the former; 1 Clement would read more smoothly were the reference to Jesus not there, for it falls between references to the origin of priests and Levites, and of the kings, rulers, and leaders in the line of Judah. Thus, suggests Lindemann, albeit with suitable caution, it might be considered a gloss that was added to 1 Clement. This is an attractive suggestion and a plausible example of where knowledge of Paul’s letters may have influenced the text of 1 Clement after it was originally written. ...”
Gregory, Andrew F. The Reception of the New Testament in the Apostolic Fathers (pp. 150-151) Oxford University Press, 2005

* The use of references are not endorsements of their contents. Please read the entirety of the provided reference(s) to understand the author's full intentions regarding the use of these texts.

Your Feedback:

Leave a Comment

Do you have questions or comments about these texts? Please submit them here.

Anonymous comments are welcome. All comments are subject to moderation.

User Comments

,

Find Similar Texts

Go to Intertext