Texts in Conversation

1 Kings ends the description of each king’s reign by noting that his deeds are written in the royal annals. Esther ends with the same formula, pointing readers to the Persian chronicles for the deeds of Mordecai.
Share:
2500 BCE
1000+ CE

1 Kings 14:29

Hebrew Bible
28 Whenever the king visited the Lord’s temple, the royal guard carried them and then brought them back to the guardroom. 29 The rest of the events of Rehoboam’s reign, including his accomplishments, are recorded in the scroll called the Annals of the Kings of Judah. 30 Rehoboam and Jeroboam were continually at war with each other. 31 Rehoboam passed away and was buried with his ancestors in the City of David. His mother was an Ammonite named Naamah. His son Abijah replaced him as king.
Date: 6th Century B.C.E. (Final composition) (based on scholarly estimates)

Esther 10:2

Hebrew Bible
1 King Ahasuerus then imposed forced labor on the land and on the coastlands of the sea. 2 Now all the actions carried out under his authority and his great achievements, along with an exact statement concerning the greatness of Mordecai, whom the king promoted, are they not written in the Book of the Chronicles of the Kings of Media and Persia? 3 Mordecai the Jew was second only to King Ahasuerus. He was the highest-ranking Jew, and he was admired by his numerous relatives. He worked enthusiastically for the good of his people and was an advocate for the welfare of all his descendants.
Date: 2nd Century B.C.E. (based on scholarly estimates)
Search:

Notes and References

#5860
... Despite all of the distinctive characteristics of Esther and the possible separate provenance of 9:20-10:3, the same four-part citation pattern is used. Hence, like the Chronicler, the writer of Esther has used the first element of the four-part citation pattern for his own purposes but has retained the distinctive structure of this formula. This expression in Esther 10:2 stands out among all regnal source formulae. An explanation of the presence of this four-part formula in such an individualistic work suggests that its use here is best accounted for by attributing it to a shared literary convention for citing (court) records among the communities that produced Kings, Chronicles, and Esther. The alternative view that this formula in Esther 10:2 is due to the influence of Kings or Chronicles appears less likely. ...

* The use of references are not endorsements of their contents. Please read the entirety of the provided reference(s) to understand the author's full intentions regarding the use of these texts.

Your Feedback:

Leave a Comment

Do you have questions or comments about these texts? Please submit them here.

Anonymous comments are welcome. All comments are subject to moderation.

Find Similar Texts

Search by the same Books

Search by the same Reference

Compare the same Books

Compare the same Text Groups

Glossary

Go to Intertext

Thank you!

We appreciate your feedback.

Got a moment for a quick survey?

This website has good content
Strongly disagree Strongly agree
This website is easy to use
Strongly disagree Strongly agree