Texts in Conversation

Esther reports that Vashti refused to come at the king’s bidding. Rabbinic tradition in tractate Megillah explains the refusal physically as the angel Gabriel made a tail grow out of her, leaving her unwilling to be displayed at the feast.
Share:
2500 BCE
1000+ CE

Esther 1:12

Hebrew Bible
11 to bring Queen Vashti into the king’s presence wearing her royal high turban. He wanted to show the people and the officials her beauty, for she was very attractive. 12 But Queen Vashti refused to come at the king’s bidding conveyed through the eunuchs. Then the king became extremely angry, and his rage consumed him. 13 The king then inquired of the wise men who were discerners of the times—for it was the royal custom to confer with all those who were proficient in laws and legalities.
Date: 2nd Century B.C.E. (based on scholarly estimates)

Megillah 12b

Babylonian Talmud
Rabbinic
The Gemara comments: Vashti was punished in this humiliating way for it is with the measure that a man measures to others that he himself is measured. In other words, God punishes individuals in line with their transgressions, measure for measure. This teaches that the wicked Vashti would take the daughters of Israel, and strip them naked, and make them work on Shabbat. Therefore, it was decreed that she be brought before the king naked, on Shabbat. This is as it is written: “After these things, when the wrath of King Ahasuerus was appeased, he remembered Vashti, and what she had done, and what was decreed against her” (Esther 2:1). That is to say, just as she had done with the young Jewish women, so it was decreed upon her. The verse states: “But the queen Vashti refused to come” (Esther 1:12). The Gemara asks: Since she was immodest, as the Master said above: The two of them had sinful intentions, what is the reason that she did not come? Rabbi Yosei bar Ḥanina said: This teaches that she broke out in leprosy, and therefore she was embarrassed to expose herself publicly. An alternative reason for her embarrassment was taught in a baraita: The angel Gabriel came and fashioned her a tail. The verse continues: “Therefore the king was very wrathful, and his anger burned in him” (Esther 1:12). The Gemara asks: Why did his anger burn in him so greatly merely because she did not wish to come? Rava said: Vashti not only refused to come, but she also sent him a message by way of a messenger: You, son of my father’s stableman [ahuriyyarei]. Belshazzar, my father, drank wine against a thousand men and did not become inebriated, as the verse in Daniel (5:1) testifies about him: “Belshazzar the king made a great feast to a thousand of his lords, and drank wine before the thousand”; and that man, referring euphemistically to Ahasuerus himself, has become senseless from his wine. Due to her audacity, immediately “his anger burned in him” (Esther 1:12).
Date: 450-550 C.E. (based on scholarly estimates)
Search:

Notes and References

#5476
“... He leaves out the Talmudic alternative that ‘Gabriel came and fixed a tail on her’ (Megillah 12b), a detail elaborated on in later representations of Vashti. The Duke of Alba’s Castilian Bible renders Vashti with an animal’s tail stemming from her head, a detail picked up in Shmarya Levin’s description of a purimshpil held in his home town of Swislowitz... Ginzberg praises Vashti’s making ‘a virtue of necessity,’ her refusal, as such is the quick-witted reply of a woman with no way out of her situation. The contradictions in her portrayal seem to result from the rabbis’ disdain for the king to whom Vashti acts as a negative foil. However, what tellingly remains consistent throughout the rabbis’ rewritings is the inscription of moral and religious integrity. She is condemned as the Persian Vashti, underlining Jewish supremacy, and for her immodesty, a characteristic, as Leila Leah Bronner has explained, that ‘became an overriding obsession in the rabbinic portrayal of women.’ Vashti is such a fascinating figure because she personifies the many fearful aspects of womanhood that are legislated against in cultural configurations of femininity: she is desirable and deplorable, invisible and figured, diseased and, ultimately, disobedient. Despite apparent contradictions, Vashti is ultimately vilified. ...”
Carruthers, Jo Esther Through the Centuries (pp. 89-90) Wiley-Blackwell, 2008

* The use of references are not endorsements of their contents. Please read the entirety of the provided reference(s) to understand the author's full intentions regarding the use of these texts.

Your Feedback:

Leave a Comment

Do you have questions or comments about these texts? Please submit them here.

Anonymous comments are welcome. All comments are subject to moderation.

Find Similar Texts

Search by the same Books

Search by the same Reference

Compare the same Books

Compare the same Text Groups

Go to Intertext