Texts in Conversation
Genesis 3 calls the serpent “shrewd” and leaves the speaker unnamed. The Greek Septuagint changes this to “wise,” removes the challenge to God’s command, and names the serpent as the speaker, connecting the story to a tradition where animals could talk.
Share:
2500 BCE
1000+ CE
Genesis 3:1
Hebrew Bible
1 Now the serpent was shrewder than any of the wild animals that the Lord God had made. He said to the woman, “Is it really true that God said, ‘You must not eat from any tree of the orchard’?” 2 The woman said to the serpent, “We may eat of the fruit from the trees of the orchard; 3 but concerning the fruit of the tree that is in the middle of the orchard God said, ‘You must not eat from it, and you must not touch it, or else you will die.’”
Date: 750–400 BCE (based on scholarly estimates)
LXX Genesis 3:1
Septuagint
1 Now the serpent was the wisest of all the brutes on the earth, which the Lord God made, and the serpent said to the woman, Why has God said, Do not eat of every tree of the garden? 2 And the woman said to the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden, 3 but of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God said, You shall not eat of it, neither shall you touch it, for fear that you might die.
Date: 300–201 BCE (based on scholarly estimates)
Tags:
Search:
Notes and References
"... Although the meaning of the Hebrew adjective “arum” (עָרוּם, “shrewd” or “cunning”) can be ambiguous, in the context of Genesis 3:1 it is generally understood to have a negative or pejorative connotation. In contrast, the Greek word that is used as the equivalent for this term in the Septuagint, “phrónimos” (φρόνιμος, “prudent” or “wise”), has a positive value. Furthermore, a generic term for snakes is used, and the serpent is said to belong to the wild animals that are upon the earth. As well, while the Hebrew text does not identify the subject of the verb “wayōmer” (וַיֹּאמֶר, “and he said”), the Septuagint repeats that it is the serpent that is talking. The serpent’s initial words are translated as questioning God’s motive, removing the difficult expression of “ap ki” (“אף כי”, “indeed?” or “even though”), and perhaps the trickery that might have been involved in the statement ..."
Bryna Brodt, “The Serpent's Identity in Genesis 3: A History of Jewish Interpretation from the Bible Through the Thirteenth Century” (MA diss., McGill University, 2002), 19.
* The use of references are not endorsements of their contents. Please read the entirety of the provided reference(s) to understand the author's full intentions regarding the use of these texts.
Your Feedback:
Leave a Comment
Anonymous comments are welcome. All comments are subject to moderation.
1 && show(index - 1)"
@keydown.right.window="open && comments.length > 1 && show(index + 1)">
User Comments
,