Texts in Conversation

In Numbers, Balaam says that God has not looked on iniquity in Jacob or seen trouble in Israel. The Aramaic translation in Targum Onkelos makes Balaam himself the one looking and narrows what he fails to find there to idol worship and the telling of lies.
Share:
2500 BCE
1000+ CE

Numbers 23:21

Hebrew Bible
19 God is not a man, that he should lie, nor a human being, that he should change his mind. Has he said, and will he not do it? Or has he spoken, and will he not make it happen? 20 Indeed, I have received a command to bless; he has blessed, and I cannot reverse it. 21 He has not looked on iniquity in Jacob, nor has he seen trouble in Israel. The Lord their God is with them; his acclamation as king is among them. 22 God brought them out of Egypt. They have, as it were, the strength of a wild bull.
Date: 5th Century B.C.E. (Final composition) (based on scholarly estimates)

Onkelos Numbers 23:21

Targum
19 The word of Eloha is not as the words of men; The sons of men speak, but lie; Nor is it as the works of the children of flesh, Who decree to do, but repent, and change their counsels. What He hath said He will perform, And His every word is steadfast. 20 Behold, I have received benedictions to bless Israel, And I may not turn my blessing from him. 21 I have seen that in the house of Jakob The worshippers of idols are not, Nor in Israel the workers of the work of lies. 22 The Word of the Lord their God is their helper, And the Shekinah of their King is among them. God, who brought them out from Mizraim, Becomes his strength and exaltation.
Date: 100-200 C.E. (based on scholarly estimates)
Search:

Notes and References

#6367
“... 21. I LOOKED...AMONG THEM. Verse 21 has four concise statements: “No one has beheld evil in Jacob; neither has one seen perverseness in Israel; the Lord his God is with him; and the shouting for the King [God] is among them” (see page 407). Our targumist explains the four statements by reordering the words, adding deeds to the first two, and separating the deity and humans in the final pair. Specifically, (1) he paraphrases the first negative statement in an affirmative manner. He explains “evil” as the supreme evil, “idol worshipping,” and clarifies that the figure of speech (synecdoche) “in Jacob” denotes the entire nation, “the house of Jacob.” He ignores the interpretation in Rashi and Rashbam that God did not see any Israelite misdeeds, since Israel clearly acted improperly repeatedly. Instead, it is Balaam who looked; or, more precisely istakalit, which literally means, “examined the matter closely.” (2) He inserts into the second phrase “and there are also,” as in 20:5 and 23:19, 23; deletes “He sees,” which is now unnecessary because the introductory “looked” applies to the entire verse and because he does not attribute the seeing to God; and explains amal, “mischief” or “trouble,” as those who utter weak lies. [...] (3) He does not paraphrase “the Lord his God is with him” by inserting Shekhinah (the human feeling of the divine presence), as would be expected, since he placed Shekhinah in the next phrase, and prefers to avoid repetitions. Instead, he substitutes the frequently used phrase “the memra [word or wisdom] of the Lord their God helps them.” ...”
Drazin, Israel, and Stanley M. Wagner Onkelos on the Torah, Numbers: Understanding the Bible Text (p. 221) Gefen, 2006

* The use of references are not endorsements of their contents. Please read the entirety of the provided reference(s) to understand the author's full intentions regarding the use of these texts.

Your Feedback:

Leave a Comment

Do you have questions or comments about these texts? Please submit them here.

Anonymous comments are welcome. All comments are subject to moderation.

Find Similar Texts

Search by the same Books

Search by the same Reference

Compare the same Books

Compare the same Text Groups

Glossary

Go to Intertext

Thank you!

We appreciate your feedback.

Got a moment for a quick survey?

This website has good content
Strongly disagree Strongly agree
This website is easy to use
Strongly disagree Strongly agree