Texts in Conversation

The Letter of Aristeas has the translators compare their work until they agree, with no miracle. In the Stromata, Clement of Alexandria keeps the comparison but credits the agreement to God, so that the translation becomes a kind of Greek prophecy.
Share:
2500 BCE
1000+ CE

Letter of Aristeas 1:302

Letter of Aristeas to Philocrates
Pseudepigrapha, Hebrew Bible Expansions
Three days later Demetrius took the men and passing along the sea-wall, seven stadia long, to the island, crossed the bridge and made for the northern districts of Pharos. There he assembled them in a house, which had been built on the sea-shore, of great beauty and in a secluded situation, and invited them to carry out the work of translation, since everything that they needed for the purpose was placed at their disposal. So they set to work comparing their several results and making them agree, and whatever they agreed on was suitably copied out under the direction of Demetrius.
Date: 200-150 B.C.E. (based on scholarly estimates)
Early Christian
And they being the subjects of the Macedonians, selected from those of highest character among them seventy elders, versed in the Scriptures, and skilled in the Greek dialect, and sent them to him with the divine books. And each having severally translated each prophetic book, and all the translations being compared together, they agreed both in meaning and expression. For it was the counsel of God carried out for the benefit of Grecian ears. It was not alien to the inspiration of God, who gave the prophecy, also to produce the translation, and make it as it were Greek prophecy.
Date: 195-205 C.E. (based on scholarly estimates)
Search:

Notes and References

#7436
“... Irenaeus (c. 130-208) is the first witness to a tradition that King Ptolemy (he thinks it was Ptolemy I) separated 'the seventy' to prevent collusion in suppressing elements of the Law (Against Heresies 3.21.2-3, in Eusebius HE 5.8.11-15). His aim is clearly apologetic; he argues for the superiority of the LXX and its divine authority over against the new Jewish versions. The fact that the seventy translators, working separately, produced identical versions, demonstrates the inspired nature of the LXX by comparison with the individual productions of the Jewish scholars, which are all different. He also emphasizes the skill of the translators. The supreme proof of the efficacy of the miraculous agreement is, however, that even the Gentiles acknowledged its divine inspiration (an indication perhaps that use was made of the legend in missionary contexts). Clement of Alexandria (c. 150-211/216) follows very similar lines, as does Tertullian (c. 160-220). The latter, writing in Latin, is, incidentally, the first Christian author to mention Ep. Arist. by name. ...”
Dines, Jennifer M. The Septuagint (p. 76) T&T Clark, 2004

* The use of references are not endorsements of their contents. Please read the entirety of the provided reference(s) to understand the author's full intentions regarding the use of these texts.

Your Feedback:

Leave a Comment

Do you have questions or comments about these texts? Please submit them here.

Anonymous comments are welcome. All comments are subject to moderation.

User Comments

,

Go to Intertext