Texts in Conversation

Genesis 29 depicts Leah as a secondary, demoted wife, yet God gives her favor in response to her status. The story inverts the values inherent in Deuteronomistic laws about divorce, where a husband may demote or reject a wife through no fault of her own.
Share:

Genesis 29:31

Hebrew Bible
30 Jacob slept with Rachel as well. He also loved Rachel more than Leah. Then he worked for Laban for seven more years. 31 When the Lord saw that Leah was unloved, he enabled her to become pregnant while Rachel remained childless. 32 So Leah became pregnant and gave birth to a son. She named him Reuben, for she said, “The Lord has looked with pity on my oppressed condition. Surely my husband will love me now.” 33 She became pregnant again and had another son. She said, “Because the Lord heard that I was unloved, he gave me this one too.” So she named him Simeon.
Date: 5th Century B.C.E. (Final composition) (based on scholarly estimates)

Deuteronomy 21:15

Hebrew Bible
14 If you are not pleased with her, then you must let her go where she pleases. You cannot in any case sell her; you must not take advantage of her, since you have already humiliated her. 15 Suppose a man has two wives, one he loves and one he hates30, and they both bear him sons, with the firstborn being the child of the less-loved wife. 16 In the day he divides his inheritance he must not appoint as firstborn the son of the favorite wife in place of the other wife’s son who is actually the firstborn. 17 Rather, he must acknowledge the son of the less-loved wife as firstborn and give him the double portion of all he has, for that son is the beginning of his father’s procreative power—to him should go the right of the firstborn.
Date: 6th Century B.C.E. (Final composition) (based on scholarly estimates)
Search:

Notes and References

#5219
"... The legal text from the Hebrew Bible that is most relevant for a discussion of Jacob’s love and hate in Genesis 29 is Deuteronomy 21:15–17. Although various commentators have long noted a possible connection between the Genesis narrative and the Deuteronomic law, in recent scholarship it is the work of Calum Carmichael that stands out as attempting to identify a direct connection between the two passages. (The question of whether or not such a connection exists will be taken up later in this study.) As Carmichael points out, this legal text “raises the question . . . about what a man might do should he be married to two wives, one of whom he hates, the other whom he loves, and whose firstborn son is by the former. It is Reuben’s situation exactly.”10 In other words, the situation of the firstborn son described in the law matches with that of Reuben described in Genesis. But in terms of the wife who is said to be the hated one in the Deuteronomic text, that would seem to be Leah’s situation exactly. What, therefore, does the law mean when it says that one of the wives is “hated”? ... The husband had the right to enact such a demotion, but, in the eyes of the law, the wife had done nothing to deserve it ..."
Wells, Bruce First Wives Club: Divorce, Demotion, and the Fate of Leah in Genesis 29 (pp. 101-129) Maarav 18.1-2, 2011

* The use of references are not endorsements of their contents. Please read the entirety of the provided reference(s) to understand the author's full intentions regarding the use of these texts.

Your Feedback:

Leave a Comment

Do you have questions or comments about these texts? Please submit them here.

Anonymous comments are welcome. All comments are subject to moderation.

Find Similar Texts

Search by the same Books

Search by the same Reference

Compare the same Books

Compare the same Text Groups

Go to Intertext