“... It is interesting, however, that Jubilees, which appears dependent on the Aramaic Levi Document or its source, does append to its account of Dinah an excursus which deals generally with intermarriage with foreigners and uses similar language to what we find in these fragments of the Aramaic Levi Document. Thus Jub. 30:7 condemns the father or brother, who gives away daughter or sister in marriage to a foreigner, to stoning, and also condemns the daughter, herself, — to be burned. The same applies in reverse in 30:11 to sons marrying foreign women. [...] The Dinah episode lent itself to use for reflection on marriage with Gentiles. What links Aramaic Levi Document and Jubilees is more than that. It includes particular applications of priestly law from Leviticus and a sanitised account of Levi’s exploits which makes him a hero and model for his successors on the pattern of Phinehas. There are also aspects in common which are beyond our theme, in particular, the instructions about preparing sacrifices and Isaac’s blessing. In Aramaic Levi Document roles attributed to Judah have been assimilated to the priesthood of Levi, whereas in Jubilees they remain distinct though nevertheless subordinate. Yet the disparity in the evaluation of Dinah and the different foci, primarily on priests in Aramaic Levi Document and on people in Jubilees, implies either a critical reworking by Jubilees of Aramaic Levi Document or use of a common source.** ...”