“... It is possible, therefore, that both texts, rather than being directly interdependent in one direction or another, draw on a “common interpretation” of Psalm 119.44 This view, if correct, (a) underscores that the writers of these texts and of the underlying tradition were personifying traditional references to evil; and (b) suggests that such a reinterpretation of biblical prayer was more gen- erally widespread than the evidence preserved in 4Q213a and 11Q5 alone. Lange, however, has argued against a dependence of either text on Psalm 119 and, instead, reasons as follows for a literary dependence between the two documents: (1) it is unlikely that both 4Q213a and 11Q5 column xix would have indepen- dently substituted the term “iniquity” of the Psalm with “Satan”; and (2) both texts exhibit “extensive parallels in demonic thought”.45 ...”