Go to Related Reading
About this book

Romans

About this book
Chapter 11

1 So I ask, God has not rejected his people, has he? Absolutely not!⁠ For I too am an Israelite, a descendant of Abraham, from the tribe of Benjamin. 2 God has not rejected his people whom he foreknew! Do you not know what the scripture says about Elijah, how he pleads with God against Israel? 3 “Lord, they have killed your prophets; they have demolished your altars; I alone am left, and they are seeking my life!” 4 But what was the divine response to him? “I have kept for myself 7,000 people who have not bent the knee to Baal.”⁠ 5 So in the same way at the present time there is a remnant chosen by grace. 6 And if it is by grace, it is no longer by works, otherwise grace would no longer be grace. 7 What then? Israel failed to obtain what it was diligently seeking, but the elect obtained it. The rest were hardened, 8 as it is written, “God gave them a spirit of stupor, eyes that would not see and ears that would not hear, to this very day.” 9 And David says, “Let their table become a snare and trap, a stumbling block and a retribution for them; 10 let their eyes be darkened so that they may not see, and make their backs bend continually.”⁠ 11 I ask then, they did not stumble into an irrevocable fall, did they? Absolutely not! But by their transgression salvation has come to the Gentiles, to make Israel jealous.⁠ 12 Now if their transgression means riches for the world and their defeat means riches for the Gentiles, how much more will their full restoration bring? 13 Now I am speaking to you Gentiles. Seeing that I am an apostle to the Gentiles, I magnify my ministry, 14 if somehow I could provoke my people to jealousy and save some of them. 15 For if their rejection is the reconciliation of the world, what will their acceptance be but life from the dead? 16 If the first portion of the dough offered is holy, then the whole batch is holy, and if the root is holy, so too are the branches. 17 Now if some of the branches were broken off, and you, a wild olive shoot, were grafted in among them and participated in the richness of the olive root,⁠ 18 do not boast over the branches. But if you boast, remember that you do not support the root, but the root supports you. 19 Then you will say, “The branches were broken off so that I could be grafted in.” 20 Granted! They were broken off because of their unbelief, but you stand by faith. Do not be arrogant, but fear! 21 For if God did not spare the natural branches, perhaps he will not spare you. 22 Notice therefore the kindness and harshness of God—harshness toward those who have fallen, but God’s kindness toward you, provided you continue in his kindness; otherwise you also will be cut off. 23 And even they—if they do not continue in their unbelief—will be grafted in, for God is able to graft them in again. 24 For if you were cut off from what is by nature a wild olive tree, and grafted, contrary to nature, into a cultivated olive tree, how much more will these natural branches be grafted back into their own olive tree? 25 For I do not want you to be ignorant of this mystery, brothers and sisters, so that you may not be conceited: A partial hardening has happened to Israel until the full number of the Gentiles has come in.⁠ 26 And so all Israel will be saved, as it is written: “The Deliverer will come out of Zion; he will remove ungodliness from Jacob. 27 And this is my covenant with them, when I take away their sins.” 28 In regard to the gospel they are enemies for your sake, but in regard to election they are dearly loved for the sake of the fathers.⁠ 29 For the gifts and the call of God are irrevocable. 30 Just as you were formerly disobedient to God, but have now received mercy due to their disobedience, 31 so they too have now been disobedient in order that, by the mercy shown to you, they too may now receive mercy. 32 For God has consigned all people to disobedience so that he may show mercy to them all. 33 Oh, the depth of the riches and wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable are his judgments and how unfathomable his ways!⁠ 34 For who has known the mind of the Lord, or who has been his counselor? 35 Or who has first given to God that God needs to repay him?⁠ 36 For from him and through him and to him are all things. To him be glory forever! Amen.

Texts in conversation

Compare Romans 11:28 and Kiddushin 36a

New Testament · Rabbinic

Share:

Summary

In Romans 11, Paul says Israel is still loved because of the ancestral covenant and God’s promises. Tractate Kiddushin has a similar view and says the covenant continues despite disobedience because of God’s compassion and the merit of the ancestors.

Passages

Romans 11:28

New Testament
25 For I do not want you to be ignorant of this mystery, brothers and sisters, so that you may not be conceited: A partial hardening has happened to Israel until the full number of the Gentiles has come in. 26 And so all Israel will be saved, as it is written: “The Deliverer will come out of Zion; he will remove ungodliness from Jacob. 27 And this is my covenant with them, when I take away their sins.” 28 In regard to the gospel they are enemies for your sake, but in regard to election they are dearly loved for the sake of the fathers. 29 For the gifts and the call of God are irrevocable.
55–58 CE (scholarly estimate) Read in Romans

Kiddushin 36a

Rabbinic · Babylonian Talmud
And Rabbi Meir says: Either way you are still called sons, as it is stated: “They are foolish sons” (Jeremiah 4:22). And it also states: “Sons in whom there is no faithfulness” (Deuteronomy 32:20). And it states: “A seed of evildoers, sons who deal corruptly” (Isaiah 1:4). And it states: “And it shall come to pass that, instead of what was said to them: You are not My people, it shall be said to them: Sons of the living God” (Hosea 2:1). The Gemara asks: Why is it necessary to cite these additional proofs introduced by the phrase: And it states? All these verses apparently make the same point. The Gemara explains why all the quotes are necessary. And if you would say: Granted, when they are foolish they are still called sons, as the verse states: “Foolish sons,” but when they do not have faithfulness they are not called sons; therefore, come and hear another verse. And that verse states: “Sons in whom there is no faithfulness.”
450–550 CE (scholarly estimate) Read in Kiddushin

References

"... In spite of what might initially seem to be the meaning of the 'on condition that' passages — that God would cancel the covenant if its conditions were not fulfilled — there is actually no hint of such a view in the entire body of Tannaitic literature. The 'on condition that' passages themselves are not directed toward such a possibility. Partially, they are hortatory, insisting that the named commandment should be observed. The primary intention, however, is to emphasize that anyone wishing to deny the implications of the covenant — the obligation to keep its commandments — is considered to be rejecting the covenant itself, essentially 'denying the exodus.' While such a person may choose to withdraw from the covenant, this does not imply cancellation on God's part. The Rabbis never doubted that God would remain faithful to the covenantal promises, even when met with disobedience. This universal view is distinctly stated by R. Jose (b. Halafta): 'No word of blessing that issued from the mouth of the Holy One, blessed be He, even if based upon a condition, was ever withdrawn by Him.' This point is elaborated in the Mekilta, where R. Eleazar b. R. Jose says in the name of Abba Jose the son of the Damascene: "And God saw the children of Israel," knowing that they would provoke Him in the future; 'and God took cognizance of them,' knowing that they would blaspheme in the future. So why was He so lenient? Because of the power of repentance. Similarly, why does it say that "He was their Savior" (Isaiah 63.8) when He knew that Israel would deal falsely with Him? Because 'He, being full of compassion, forgives iniquity' (Psalm 78:38). The only possible exception to this view — that God maintained the promises of the covenant despite disobedience — is a remark attributed to R. Judah (Sifre Deuteronomy 96 (157; to 14.1); compare Kiddushin 36a) ..."
E. P. Sanders, Paul and Palestinian Judaism: A Comparison of Patterns of Religion (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1977), 95.

References are not endorsements of their contents. Read each reference in full to understand its author's intentions in using these texts.

Your feedback

Romans 11:28 and Kiddushin 36a

Leave a comment

Your questions and comments are welcome!

Comments

Glossary

Search the Library