Go to Related Reading
About this book

Antiquities of the Jews, Book 19

About this book
Chapter 5

1 Now when Claudius had taken out of the way all those soldiers whom he suspected, which he did immediately, he published an edict; and in it confirmed that Kingdom to Agrippa, which Caius had given him: and in it commended the King highly. He also made an addition to it; of all that country over which Herod, who was his grandfather, had reigned; that is Judea and Samaria. And this he restored to him as due to his family. As for Abila of Lysanias, and all that lay at mount Libanus, he bestowed them upon him, as out of his own territories.⁠ He also made a league with this Agrippa, confirmed by oaths, in the middle of the forum, in the city of Rome. He also took away from Antiochus that Kingdom which he was possessed of; but gave him a certain part of Cilicia, and Commagene. He also set Alexander Lysimachus the alabarch at liberty, who had been his old friend, and steward to his mother Antonia: but had been imprisoned by Caius. Whose son married Bernice, the daughter of Agrippa. But when Marcus, Alexander’s son, was dead, who had married her when she was a virgin, Agrippa gave her in marriage to his brother Herod: and begged for him of Claudius the Kingdom of Chalcis. 2Now about this time there was a sedition between the Jews and the Greeks, at the city of Alexandria. For when Caius was dead, the nation of the Jews, which had been very much oppressed under the reign of Caius, and reduced to very great distress by the people of Alexandria, recovered itself; and immediately took up their arms to fight for themselves. So Claudius sent an order to the president of Egypt to quiet that tumult. He also sent an edict, at the requests of King Agrippa, and King Herod both to Alexandria and to Syria. Whose contents were as follows: “Tiberius Claudius Cesar, Augustus, Germanicus, High Priest, and Tribune of the people, ordains thus. Since I am assured that the Jews of Alexandria, called Alexandrians, have been joint inhabitants in the earliest times with the Alexandrians; and have obtained from their Kings equal privileges with them: as is evident by the public records that are in their possession, and the edicts themselves: and that after Alexandria had been subjected to our empire by Augustus, their rights and privileges have been preserved by those presidents who have at various times been sent there: and that no dispute had been raised about those rights and privileges, even when Aquila was governor of Alexandria: and that when the Jewish ethnarch was dead, Augustus did not prohibit the making such ethnarchs: as willing that all men should be so subject as to continue in the observation of their own customs, and not be forced to transgress the ancient rules of their own country religion: but that in the time of Caius the Alexandrians became insolent towards the Jews that were among them: which Caius, out of his great madness, and lack of understanding, reduced the nation of the Jews very low; because they would not transgress the religious worship of their country, and call him a god. I therefore decree that the nation of the Jews not be deprived of their rights and privileges, on account of the madness of Caius; but that those rights and privileges which they formerly enjoyed be preserved to them; and that they may continue in their own customs. And I charge both parties to take very great care that no troubles may arise after the promulgation of this edict.” 3 And such were the contents of this edict on behalf of the Jews that was sent to Alexandria. But the edict that was sent into the other parts of the habitable earth was this which follows. “Tiberius Claudius Cesar, Augustus, Germanicus, High Priest, tribune of the people, chosen consul the second time,6 ordains thus. Upon the petition of King Agrippa, and King Herod, who are persons very dear to me, that I would grant the same rights and privileges should be preserved to the Jews which are in all the Roman Empire, which I have granted to those of Alexandria, I very willingly comply with that: and I make this grant not only for the sake of the petitioners, but as judging those Jews for whom I have been petitioned worthy of such a favour, on account of their fidelity and friendship to the Romans. I think it also very just that no Grecian city should be deprived of such rights and privileges: since they were preserved to them under the great Augustus. It will therefore be fit to permit the Jews, who are in all the world under us, to keep their ancient customs, without being hindered so to do. And I do now charge them also to use this my kindness to them with moderation; and not to show a contempt of the superstitious observances of other nations, but to keep their own laws only. And I direct that this decree of mine be engraved on tables by the magistrates of the cities, and colonies, and municipal places, both those within Italy, and those without it, both Kings and governors, by the means of the ambassadors; and to have them exposed to the public for full thirty days, in such a place, from which it may plainly be read from the ground.”

Book 20

Texts in conversation

Compare Luke 3:1 and Josephus, Antiquities of the Jews 19.5

New Testament · Classical

Share:

Summary

Luke describes John the Baptist living during the rule of Tiberius, Pilate, Herod, Philip, and Lysanias, and during the priesthood of Annas and Caiaphas. Josephus also mentions Lysanias as tetrarch of Abilene, highlighting the political situation.

Passages

Luke 3:1

New Testament
1 In the fifteenth year of the reign of Tiberius Caesar, when Pontius Pilate was governor of Judea, and Herod was tetrarch of Galilee, and his brother Philip was tetrarch of the region of Iturea and Trachonitis, and Lysanias was tetrarch of Abilene, 2 during the high priesthood of Annas and Caiaphas, the word of God came to John the son of Zechariah in the wilderness. 3 He went into all the region around the Jordan River, preaching a baptism of repentance for the forgiveness of sins.
75–85 CE (scholarly estimate) Read in Luke
1 Now when Claudius had taken out of the way all those soldiers whom he suspected, which he did immediately, he published an edict; and in it confirmed that Kingdom to Agrippa, which Caius had given him: and in it commended the King highly. He also made an addition to it; of all that country over which Herod, who was his grandfather, had reigned; that is Judea and Samaria. And this he restored to him as due to his family. As for Abila of Lysanias, and all that lay at mount Libanus, he bestowed them upon him, as out of his own territories. He also made a league with this Agrippa, confirmed by oaths, in the middle of the forum, in the city of Rome. He also took away from Antiochus that Kingdom which he was possessed of; but gave him a certain part of Cilicia, and Commagene. He also set Alexander Lysimachus the alabarch at liberty, who had been his old friend, and steward to his mother Antonia: but had been imprisoned by Caius. Whose son married Bernice, the daughter of Agrippa. But when Marcus, Alexander’s son, was dead, who had married her when she was a virgin, Agrippa gave her in marriage to his brother Herod: and begged for him of Claudius the Kingdom of Chalcis.

References

"... In addition to the parallels considered in this and earlier chapters, several less significant ones may be mentioned: (i) Luke's mention of "Lysanias, tetrarch of Abilene" (Luke 3:1; compare War 2.215,247; Ant. 19.275); (ii) Luke's parable of the man who traveled to another country to receive his kingship, but was hated by his own people, whom he punished with death, which seems like a thinly veiled reference to the family of Herod as described by Josephus (Luke 19:12-27; War 1.282-285); (iii) Luke's description of the siege and destruction of Jerusalem, including a reference to the slaughter of children (Luke 19:43-44; compare War 6 in general); and (iv) Luke's reference to a famine during the reign of Claudius, in which Barnabas and Saul brought relief to Jerusalem from Antioch (Acts 11:28-29; compare Ant. 3.320; 20.51-53, 101). Although they do not seem at first to describe the same incident, (v) Luke's reference to Pilate's attack on some Galileans (Luke 13:1) sounds somewhat like Josephus' account of Pilate's dealings with some Samaritans at Mt. Gerizim (Ant. 18.85-87). In my view, these parallels are too vague to establish a relationship between the texts. Nevertheless, the affinities discussed above and in earlier chapters do indicate such a relationship. In any given case—say, the connection of the Egyptian with the sicarii or with the desert—one might be content to dismiss the affinity with Josephus as a coincidence. But a series of half a dozen such coincidences of narrative detail, combined with the coincidence that Luke happened to include some key features of Josephus' story (the census, the three rebel figures), makes the hypothesis that Luke had some knowledge of Josephus more likely than not ..."
Steve Mason, Josephus and the New Testament (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1992), 282.

References are not endorsements of their contents. Read each reference in full to understand its author's intentions in using these texts.

Your feedback

Luke 3:1 and Josephus, Antiquities of the Jews 19.5

Leave a comment

Your questions and comments are welcome!

Comments

Glossary

Search the Library