Go to Related Reading
About this book

Acts of Archelaus

Acta Archelai

About this book
Chapter 5

On receiving the epistle, then, Marcellus opened it, and read it in the presence of Archelaus, the bishop of the place. And the following is a copy of what it contained: — Manichaeus, an apostle of Jesus Christ, and all the saints who are with me, and the virgins, to Marcellus, my beloved son: Grace, mercy, and peace be with you from God the Father, and from our Lord Jesus Christ; and may the right hand of light preserve you safe from this present evil world, and from its calamities, and from the snares of the wicked one. Amen. I was exceedingly delighted to observe the love cherished by you, which truly is of the largest measure. But I was distressed at your faith, which is not in accordance with the right standard. Wherefore, deputed as I am to seek the elevation of the race of men, and sparing, as I do, those who have given themselves over to deceit and error, I have considered it needful to dispatch this letter to you, with a view, in the first place, to the salvation of your own soul, and in the second place also to that of the souls of those who are with you, so as to secure you against dubious opinions, and specially against notions like those in which the guides of the simpler class of minds indoctrinate their subjects, when they allege that good and evil have the same original subsistence, and when they posit the same beginning for them, without making any distinction or discrimination between light and darkness, and between the good and the evil or worthless, and between the inner man and the outer, as we have stated before, and without ceasing to mix up and confound together the one with the other. But, O my son, refuse thus thoughtlessly to identify these two things in the irrational and foolish fashion common to the mass of men, and ascribe no such confusion to the God of goodness. For these men refer the beginning and the end and the paternity of these ills to God Himself —whose end is near a curse. For they do not believe the word spoken by our Saviour and Lord Jesus Christ Himself in the Gospels, namely, that a good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.⁠ And how they can be bold enough to call God the maker and contriver of Satan and his wicked deeds, is a matter of great amazement to me. Yea, would that even this had been all the length to which they had gone with their silly efforts, and that they had not declared that the only-begotten Christ, who has descended from the bosom of the Father,⁠ is the son of a certain woman, Mary, and born of blood and flesh and the varied impurities proper to women! Howbeit, neither to write too much in this epistle, nor to trespass at too great length upon your good nature, — and all the more so that I have no natural gift of eloquence — I shall content myself with what I have said. But you will have full knowledge of the whole subject when I am present with you, if indeed you still continue to care for your own salvation. For I do not "cast a snare upon any one," as is done by the less thoughtful among the mass of men.⁠ Think of what I say, most honourable son.

Texts in conversation

Compare John 1:18 and Hegemonius, Archelaus Acts of the Disputation with Manes 5

New Testament · Early Christian

Share:

Summary

In the Acts of the Disputation with Manes, Mani cites John where no one has seen God to argue that good and evil exist as two separate natures, claiming that God cannot be connected to the material world. The author uses this to oppose Mani’s dualism.

Passages

John 1:18

New Testament
16 For we have all received from his fullness one gracious gift after another. 17 For the law was given through Moses, but grace and truth came about through Jesus Christ. 18 No one has ever seen God. The only one, himself God, who is in closest fellowship with the Father, has made God known. 19 Now this was John’s testimony when the Jewish leaders sent priests and Levites from Jerusalem to ask him, “Who are you?” 20 He confessed—he did not deny but confessed—“I am not the Christ!”
90–110 CE (scholarly estimate) Read in John

Hegemonius, Archelaus Acts of the Disputation with Manes 5

Early Christian · Acta Archelai
For these men refer the beginning and the end and the paternity of these ills to God Himself —whose end is near a curse. For they do not believe the word spoken by our Saviour and Lord Jesus Christ Himself in the Gospels, namely, that a good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit. And how they can be bold enough to call God the maker and contriver of Satan and his wicked deeds, is a matter of great amazement to me. Yea, would that even this had been all the length to which they had gone with their silly efforts, and that they had not declared that the only-begotten Christ, who has descended from the bosom of the Father, is the son of a certain woman, Mary, and born of blood and flesh and the varied impurities proper to women! Howbeit, neither to write too much in this epistle, nor to trespass at too great length upon your good nature, — and all the more so that I have no natural gift of eloquence — I shall content myself with what I have said.
313–348 CE (scholarly estimate) Read in Hegemonius, Acts of Archelaus

References

"... The main argument given by Mani for the existence of Two Natures is that God cannot be responsible in any way for the existence of evil. He readily admits that the majority of people believe in only one nature, but if this were true, it would “insult the goodness of God” and attribute the source of all evil to God (Acts of Archelaus 5.4). Here begins the thrust of the Manichaean point of view found in the AA: it is impossible to contemplate that God has created evil in the form of Satan, or impossible to contemplate that God is the source of any evil. The whole point of this introductory letter is to show that there are two natures, good and evil. Mani cites Matthew 7:18 to try to convince Marcellus that there are two natures. Intimately tied in with the two natures is the idea that Christ could not have been born of a woman, and here Mani cites John 1:18 ..."
Kevin Kaatz, “The Light and the Darkness: The Two Natures, Free Will, and the Scriptural Evidence in the Acta Archelai,” in Frontiers of Faith: The Christian Encounter with Manichaeism in the Acts of Archelaus, ed. Jason BeDuhn and Paul Allan Mirecki (Leiden: Brill, 2007), 103–118.

References are not endorsements of their contents. Read each reference in full to understand its author's intentions in using these texts.

Your feedback

John 1:18 and Hegemonius, Archelaus Acts of the Disputation with Manes 5

Leave a comment

Your questions and comments are welcome!

Comments

Glossary

Search the Library