Go to Related Reading
About this book

Ecclesiastes Rabbah

Aggadah

About this book
Chapter 6

1 “There is an evil that I have seen under the sun, and it is prevalent among men” (Ecclesiastes 6:1).
“There is an evil that I have seen under the sun.” Rabbi Shmuel bar Ami said: This is the thought of swindlers, like one who mixes water into wine, poppy oil into [olive] oil, spring water into honey, donkey milk into balsam oil, sap into myrrh, grape leaves into valuable pollen, water dyed red into fish brine, vetch into pepper, [or one who uses] a scale beam that is long on one side and short on the other side. Regarding all these, Rabbi Yoḥanan ben Zakkai said: Woe is me if I say it, and woe is me if I do not say it. If I say it, perhaps the swindlers will learn [new techniques for swindling]. If I do not say it, the swindlers will say: The Torah scholars are not conversant in our handiwork.1 Ultimately, he said it, “for the ways of the Lord are straight, the righteous walk in them [and the transgressors stumble in them]” (Hosea 14:10).2

2 “A man to whom God gives wealth, assets, and honor, and he lacks nothing for his soul of everything that he desires, but God does not give him power to partake of it; rather a stranger partakes of it. This is vanity, and it is a grave disease” (Ecclesiastes 6:2).
“A man to whom God gives” – Rabbi Abba bar Kahana entered a synagogue and he heard the voice of Rabbi Levi sitting and expounding this verse: “A man to whom God gives wealth” – this is one well-versed in Bible; “assets” – this is one well-versed in Mishna; “and honor” – this is one well-versed in Tosefta; “and he lacks nothing for his soul of everything that he desires” – like the mishna of Rabbi Akiva, the mishna of Rabbi Ḥiyya, of Rabbi Hoshaya, and of bar Kappara;1 “but God does not give him power to partake of it” – as it is prohibited to issue halakhic rulings on their basis; “rather a stranger partakes of it” – this is one well-versed in Talmud, who impurifies and purifies, prohibits and permits. Rabbi Abba bar Kahana rose and kissed him on his head. He said to him: ‘Had I entered only to hear this homily from you, it would have sufficed.’ Rabbi Yishmael says: “The wealthy is wise in his eyes” (Proverbs 28:11), this is one well-versed in Talmud; “and the impoverished one who understands will examine him” (Proverbs 28:11), this is one well-versed in aggada.

3 “If a man begets one hundred, and lives many years, and the days of his years are many, but his soul is not sated from the good, and he did not have a burial; I say, a stillborn is better than he” (Ecclesiastes 6:3).
“If a man begets one hundred” – this is Cain who begot one hundred sons; “and lives many years” – as [Cain] lived many years; “and the days of his years are many [but his soul is not sated from the good]” – his soul was not sated by his possessions and was not sated from the good of the world; “and he did not have a burial” – he was in abeyance, weakening, and the flood came and washed him away, as it is written: “He obliterated all the yekum” (Genesis 7:23). What is the yekum? It is existence [kiyyum]. Rabbi Bon said: The sustainers [okuminei].1). Rabbi Elazar says: The yekum are the possessions that bolster the standing of their owner.2]. Rabbi Shmuel says: The yekum is Cain,3] against Abel his brother, and killed him” (Genesis 4:8). who was washed away. “The stillborn is better than he” – this is Abel, his brother.4).
Another matter, “If a man begets one hundred” – this is Ahab, who begot one hundred sons. Rabbi Aḥa said: But isn’t it written: “Ahab had seventy sons in Samaria” (II Kings 10:1)? Rabbi Hoshaya said: Just as he had seventy sons in Samaria, so, too, he had seventy sons in Yizre’el,5 and each and every one of them had two palaces, one for the summer and one for the winter, as it is written: “I will smite the winter house with the summer house” (Amos 3:15). Rabbi Yehuda ben Rabbi Simon said: Two for the summer and two others for the winter, as it is stated: “and the ivory houses will perish” (Amos 3:15).6 The Rabbis say: Six, as it is stated: “And many houses will be destroyed” (Amos 3:15). “And lives many years” – as he lived many years; “but his soul is not sated from the good” – from his possessions; “and he did not have a burial” – as it is written: “In the place where the dogs licked [the blood of Navot, dogs will lick your blood as well]” (I Kings 21:19). “The stillborn is better than he” – this is the stillborn of a prostitute.7

4 “For he comes in vanity, and departs in darkness, and in darkness his name is covered” (Ecclesiastes 6:4).
“For he comes in vanity, [and departs in darkness]” – is he without a lamp and without bathing? Rather, he is without Torah and without good deeds.1).

5 “He has also not seen the sun, and did not know there is more gratification for that than for this” (Ecclesiastes 6:5).
“He has also not seen the sun, and did not know.” This is analogous to two people who were coming on a ship. When they reached the port one of them disembarked and entered the country, and he saw there much food, much drink, and tranquility. When he returned to the ship he said to his fellow: ‘Why did you not enter the country?’ He said to him: ‘You, who disembarked and entered, what did you see there?’ He said to him: ‘I saw much food, much drink, and tranquility.’ He said to him: ‘Did you enjoy it at all?’ He said to him: ‘No.’ He said to him: ‘I, who did not enter, am better off than you, as I did not disembark and did not see.’1 That is what is written: “There is more gratification for that than for this.”

6 “Were he to live one thousand years twice, but did not see good, does everything not go to one place? All the toil of man is for his mouth, but the soul, too, is not filled” (Ecclesiastes 6:6–7).
“Were he to live one thousand years…all the toil of man is for his mouth.” Rabbi Shmuel said: All a person’s toil to amass mitzvot and good deeds in this world does not suffice for the breath that emerges from his mouth.1 “But the soul, too, is not filled” – even its removal does not fill the hole.2). How is the soul removed? Rabbi Yoḥanan said: It is like a rope [pulled] through a small hole.3 Rabbi Ḥanina said: It is like a knotted rope [pulled] through a small hole. Rabbi Shmuel ben Rabbi said: It is like a moist, inverted thorn [pulled] from the esophagus.
Rabbi Ḥanina ben Yitzḥak said: All a person’s toil [to amass] mitzvot and good deeds, it is for his mouth, and not for the mouth of his son and not for the mouth of his daughter.4). “But the soul, too, is not filled” – as the soul knows that in everything that it toils, it toils for itself; therefore, it is never sated with Torah and good deeds. This is analogous to a villager who married a princess. Were he to bring her everything in the world, it would still be worthless to her. Why? It is because she is the king’s daughter.5 So, too, the soul, [even] if you were to bring it all the delicacies of the world, it is nothing to it. Why? Because it is from the heavens.
There are three who do not feel a sense of gratitude to their keepers: the soul, the earth, and the woman. From where is this derived [regarding] the soul? It is as it is stated: “But the soul, too, is not filled.”6). Land, as it is written: “The earth that is not satisfied with water” (Proverbs 30:16). Woman, as it is stated: “She eats and wipes her mouth” (Proverbs 30:20).7 Three give bountifully and take bountifully, and they are: the sea,8 the earth,9 and also the kingdom.10 Rabbi Yehoshua of Sikhnin said: “Soul” is written in it six times,11] is written six times in the Torah portion of Vayikra regarding sin (Leviticus 4:2, 4:27, 5:1, 5:15, 5:17, 5:21). corresponding to the six days of Creation. The Holy One blessed be He said to the soul: Everything that I created during the six days of Creation, I created for you, yet you rob, sin, and commit acts of violence.

8 “For what advantage does the wise have over the fool, and how can the knowledgeable poor man walk before the living?” (Ecclesiastes 6:8).
“For what advantage does the wise have over the fool, and how can the knowledgeable poor man walk before the living?” Rather, what should he do? He should go to one who is greater than he in Torah, and he will explain his learning to him.1). Another matter, “how can the knowledgeable poor man” – why should one who is poor in possessions go to the wealthy?2). What should he do? He should go and engage in commerce. Another matter, “how can the knowledgeable poor man” – how can he engage in business?3). What should he do, sit idle? Let him learn a craft and the Holy One blessed be He will support him and he will live.

9 “Better is the sight of the eyes than the pursuit of the desire; this, too, is vanity and herding wind” (Ecclesiastes 6:9).
“Better is the sight of the eyes than the pursuit of the desire” – better is one who explicates his learning than one who studies and gradually becomes accustomed to rote learning.

10 “What was, its name was already called, and it is known that he is man, and neither can he contend with what is mightier than he” (Ecclesiastes 6:10).
“What was, its name was already called” – this is Adam the first man, as it is stated: “The Lord God took the man” (Genesis 2:15), “and it is known that he is man.” This is analogous to a king and a minister who were in a royal carriage and the countrymen sought to say to the king, ‘Sire,’ but they did not know which one he was. What did the king do? He shoved [the minister] out of the carriage and everyone knew that he was the minister. So too, when the Holy One blessed be He created Adam, the first man, the ministering angels were mistaken and sought to say before him: ‘Holy.’1 What did the Holy One blessed be He do? He brought sleep upon him and they knew that he was man, and He said to him: “For you are dust and you will return to dust” (Genesis 3:19).
Another matter, “what was, its name was already called” – this is Moses, as it is stated: “The Lord called to Moses” (Leviticus 1:1), and it became known to all that this Moses was a prophet when the Holy One blessed be He said to him: “Now, go, and I will send you to Pharaoh [and take My people, the children of Israel, out of Egypt]” (Exodus 3:10). When it came to that incident,2 He said: “Go descend [as your people…has been corrupted]” (Exodus 32:7). [Moses] said before Him: ‘Master of the universe, when they are good they are Yours, and when they are bad they are mine? Whether they are good or bad they are Yours.’ This is analogous to a king who has a vineyard and he entrusts it to a sharecropper to toil in it. When it produces superior wine, the king says: ‘How fine is the wine of my vineyard!’ When it produces inferior wine, the king says: ‘How poor is the wine of the vineyard of my sharecropper.’ The sharecropper weeps and cries and says before him: ‘My lord the king, when it produces superior wine it is yours, and when it produces inferior wine it is mine? Whether it is good or bad it is yours.’ So too, Moses said: ‘Whether they are good or bad, they are Yours.’
“And neither can he contend with what is mightier than he.” When he said to Him: “Please, let me cross and see the good land” (Deuteronomy 3:25), the Holy One blessed be He said to him: “Let it suffice you, do not speak to Me anymore about this matter” (Deuteronomy 3:26).
Another matter, “what was” – this is Jeremiah, and it is known to all that he is a prophet, as it is stated: “Before I formed you in the womb I knew you” (Jeremiah 1:5).

11 “As there are many matters that increase vanity, what remains for the person?” (Ecclesiastes 6:11).
“As there are many matters that increase vanity,” such as breeders of monkeys, cats, porcupines, chimpanzees, and seals; what benefit do they get from them? [They will eventually give their owner] either a bite or a sting. What benefit? It is either an injury or a wound.1 Likewise, one who removes stones from his field and places them in the public domain, what benefit does he have? It [will be] either an obstacle or [cause] a scratch, and some say: A crippling injury. There was an incident involving a certain pious man2 who was removing stones from his field and placing them in the public domain. There was a certain other pious man who pursued him and said to him: ‘Why are you removing stones from a place that is not yours, and placing them in a place that is yours?’3 He laughed at him. Several days later, that pious man was in need and sold his field. He was walking in the public domain and stumbled. He said: ‘It was not for naught that this pious man said to me that I am placing it in my own property.’ “What remains for the person?”4

12 “For who knows what is good for man in his life, all the days of his life of vanity, that he spends like a shadow? For who can tell man what will be after him under the sun?” (Ecclesiastes 6:12).
“For who knows what is good for man in his life” – Rabbi Huna [said] in the name of Rabbi Aḥa: David made a statement and did not explain it, but his son Solomon explained it. Solomon made a statement and did not explain it, but his father David explained it. Solomon said: “For who knows what is good for man in his life… that he spends like a shadow?” How so? If you say it is the shadow of a wall, it has substance. If it is the shadow of a palm tree, it has substance. David came and explained: “His days pass like a shadow” (Psalms 144:4).⁠ David made a statement and did not explain it, but his son Solomon explained it. David said: “Man is like hevel” (Psalms 144:4); to what hevel [is man compared]? If it is to the hevel [heat] of an oven, it has significance. If it is to the hevel of a stove, it has significance. His son Solomon came and explained: “Vanity of vanities [havel havalim] said Kohelet” (Ecclesiastes 1:2).
Another matter, “for who knows what is good for man in his life” – Rabbi Pinḥas said: Since the days of man are vanity, and they are numbered, and they are like a shadow, what pleasure does one have in life? Rather, let them engage in matters of Torah, which are all life. “For who can tell man [what will be after him under the sun?]” – Solomon said, I will tell you what is better than them all: “A good name is better that fine oil” (Ecclesiastes 7:1).

Texts in conversation

Compare Psalm 144:4 and Ecclesiastes Rabbah 6:12

Hebrew Bible · Rabbinic

Share:

Summary

Psalm 144 describes a person's life as a shadow that disappears. Rabbinic tradition in Ecclesiastes Rabbah says Solomon left that metaphor unexplained, and uses the psalm to say David provided the explanation.

Passages

Psalm 144:4

Hebrew Bible
3 O Lord, of what importance is the human race that you should notice them? Of what importance is mankind that you should be concerned about them? 4 People are like a vapor, their days like a shadow that disappears. 5 O Lord, make the sky sink and come down. Touch the mountains and make them smolder.
600–201 BCE (scholarly estimate) Read in Psalms

Ecclesiastes Rabbah 6:12

Rabbinic · Aggadah
“For who knows what is good for man in his life” – Rabbi Huna [said] in the name of Rabbi Aḥa: David made a statement and did not explain it, but his son Solomon explained it. Solomon made a statement and did not explain it, but his father David explained it. Solomon said: “For who knows what is good for man in his life… that he spends like a shadow?” How so? If you say it is the shadow of a wall, it has substance. If it is the shadow of a palm tree, it has substance. David came and explained: “His days pass like a shadow” (Psalms 144:4).
700–950 CE (scholarly estimate) Read in Ecclesiastes Rabbah

References

“... The rabbinic effort that aims to demonstrate the proximity between Ecclesiastes and Psalms is continued in this midrashic passage in which David is presented to explain the meaning of Solomon’s thoughts. Again, the pattern of questions–answers and the dialectical development of the rabbinic text intensify the vividness of the narration. On the other hand, by interconnecting Eccl 6:12 and Ps 144:4 we get a text with conceptual coherence, where the intertextual verse explicates the contextual meaning of the base verse. It is this explicatory relation of the intertextual verse to the base verse that justifies the explicative intertextuality of the following passage: [...] Ecclesiastes 6:12, which vividly describes man’s transient role, persists with a pessimistic view on man’s futile efforts to determine his scope on earth. The Rabbis ascertained the contextual closeness between Eccl 6:12 and Ps 144:4 and presented David (through Ps 144:4) in order to interpret Solomon (Eccl 6:12); man’s life is as transitory as the shadow to which it is likened. The rabbis wish to create contextual affinity and semantic continuity between the books of Psalms and Ecclesiastes by highlighting their semantic ties. ...”
Michail Kitsos, “Examples of Intertextuality in Ecclesiastes Rabbah: An Examination of the Book of Psalms in Ecclesiastes Rabbah with Methodological Nuances,” in Reading Ecclesiastes Intertextually, ed. Katharine Dell and Will Kynes (London: Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2014), 274–275.

References are not endorsements of their contents. Read each reference in full to understand its author's intentions in using these texts.

Your feedback

Psalm 144:4 and Ecclesiastes Rabbah 6:12

Leave a comment

Your questions and comments are welcome!

Comments

Glossary

Search the Library