Go to Related Reading
About this book

Stromata, Book 1

About this book
Chapter 22

So much for the details respecting dates, as stated variously by many, and as set down by us. It is said that the Scriptures both of the law and of the prophets were translated from the dialect of the Hebrews into the Greek language in the reign of Ptolemy the son of Lagos, or, according to others, of Ptolemy surnamed Philadelphus; Demetrius Phalereus bringing to this task the greatest earnestness, and employing painstaking accuracy on the materials for the translation. For the Macedonians being still in possession of Asia, and the king being ambitious of adorning the library he had at Alexandria with all writings, desired the people of Jerusalem to translate the prophecies they possessed into the Greek dialect. And they being the subjects of the Macedonians, selected from those of highest character among them seventy elders, versed in the Scriptures, and skilled in the Greek dialect, and sent them to him with the divine books. And each having severally translated each prophetic book, and all the translations being compared together, they agreed both in meaning and expression. For it was the counsel of God carried out for the benefit of Grecian ears. It was not alien to the inspiration of God, who gave the prophecy, also to produce the translation, and make it as it were Greek prophecy.⁠ Since the Scriptures having perished in the captivity of Nabuchodonosor, Esdras the Levite, the priest, in the time of Artaxerxes king of the Persians, having become inspired in the exercise of prophecy restored again the whole of the ancient Scriptures. And Aristobulus, in his first book addressed to Philometor, writes in these words: "And Plato followed the laws given to us, and had manifestly studied all that is said in them." And before Demetrius there had been translated by another, previous to the dominion of Alexander and of the Persians, the account of the departure of our countrymen the Hebrews from Egypt, and the fame of all that happened to them, and their taking possession of the land, and the account of the whole code of laws; so that it is perfectly clear that the above-mentioned philosopher derived a great deal from this source, for he was very learned, as also Pythagoras, who transferred many things from our books to his own system of doctrines. And Numenius, the Pythagorean philosopher, expressly writes: "For what is Plato, but Moses speak ing in Attic Greek?" This Moses was a theologian and prophet, and as some say, an interpreter of sacred laws. His family, his deeds, and life, are related by the Scriptures themselves, which are worthy of all credit; but have nevertheless to be stated by us also as well as we can.

Book 2

Texts in conversation

Compare Letter of Aristeas 302 and Clement of Alexandria, Stromata 1.22

Pseudepigrapha, Hebrew Bible Expansions · Early Christian

Share:

Summary

In the Letter of Aristeas, the translators compare their work until they agree, describing nothing miraculous. In the Stromata, Clement of Alexandria describes their work as a unique act of God, so that the translation becomes a kind of Greek prophecy.

Passages

Letter of Aristeas 302

Pseudepigrapha, Hebrew Bible Expansions · Letter of Aristeas to Philocrates
Three days later Demetrius took the men and passing along the sea-wall, seven stadia long, to the island, crossed the bridge and made for the northern districts of Pharos. There he assembled them in a house, which had been built on the sea-shore, of great beauty and in a secluded situation, and invited them to carry out the work of translation, since everything that they needed for the purpose was placed at their disposal. So they set to work comparing their several results and making them agree, and whatever they agreed on was suitably copied out under the direction of Demetrius.
200–150 BCE (scholarly estimate) Read in the Letter of Aristeas

Clement of Alexandria, Stromata 1.22

Early Christian
And they being the subjects of the Macedonians, selected from those of highest character among them seventy elders, versed in the Scriptures, and skilled in the Greek dialect, and sent them to him with the divine books. And each having severally translated each prophetic book, and all the translations being compared together, they agreed both in meaning and expression. For it was the counsel of God carried out for the benefit of Grecian ears. It was not alien to the inspiration of God, who gave the prophecy, also to produce the translation, and make it as it were Greek prophecy.
195–205 CE (scholarly estimate) Read in Clement of Alexandria, Stromata Book 1

References

“... Irenaeus (c. 130-208) is the first witness to a tradition that King Ptolemy (he thinks it was Ptolemy I) separated 'the seventy' to prevent collusion in suppressing elements of the Law (Against Heresies 3.21.2-3, in Eusebius HE 5.8.11-15). His aim is clearly apologetic; he argues for the superiority of the LXX and its divine authority over against the new Jewish versions. The fact that the seventy translators, working separately, produced identical versions, demonstrates the inspired nature of the LXX by comparison with the individual productions of the Jewish scholars, which are all different. He also emphasizes the skill of the translators. The supreme proof of the efficacy of the miraculous agreement is, however, that even the Gentiles acknowledged its divine inspiration (an indication perhaps that use was made of the legend in missionary contexts). Clement of Alexandria (c. 150-211/216) follows very similar lines, as does Tertullian (c. 160-220). The latter, writing in Latin, is, incidentally, the first Christian author to mention Ep. Arist. by name. ...”
Jennifer M. Dines, The Septuagint (London: T&T Clark, 2004), 76.

References are not endorsements of their contents. Read each reference in full to understand its author's intentions in using these texts.

Your feedback

Letter of Aristeas 302 and Clement of Alexandria, Stromata 1.22

Leave a comment

Your questions and comments are welcome!

Comments

Glossary

Search the Library