Go to Related Reading
About this book

2 Clement

About this book
Chapter 6

1 But the Lord says, “No servant can serve two masters.”⁠ If we desire to serve both God and wealth, it is useless for us: 2 For what advantage is it, if a person gains the whole world and loses their soul?⁠ 3 Now this age and the age to come are two enemies. 4 One speaks of adultery and defilement and greed and deceit, but the other rejects these. 5 We therefore cannot be friends with both, but must reject the one and keep company with the other. 6 Let us consider that it is better to hate the things here, because they are lowly, short-lived, and perishable, and to love the things there, for they are good and imperishable. 7 For, if we do the will of Christ, we shall find rest; but if otherwise, then nothing shall save us from eternal punishment if we disobey His commandments. 8 And the scripture also says in Ezekiel, “Though Noah and Job and Daniel should rise up, they shall not deliver their children in the captivity.” 9 But if even such righteous men as these cannot, by their righteous deeds, deliver their children, with what confidence shall we—if we do not keep our baptism pure and undefiled—enter the kingdom of God? Or who shall be our advocate, unless we are found having holy and righteous works?

Texts in conversation

Compare Luke 16:13 and 2 Clement 6:1

New Testament · Early Christian

Share:

Summary

In Luke 16, Jesus says no servant can serve two masters. In 2 Clement, the preacher repeats Luke's term for servant, then applies the saying to God and wealth; this may be his own explanation rather than part of the quotation.

Passages

Luke 16:13

New Testament
10 “The one who is faithful in a very little is also faithful in much, and the one who is dishonest in a very little is also dishonest in much. 11 If then you haven’t been trustworthy in handling worldly wealth, who will entrust you with the true riches? 12 And if you haven’t been trustworthy with someone else’s property, who will give you your own? 13 No servant can serve two masters, for either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and money.” 14 The Pharisees (who loved money) heard all this and ridiculed him.
75–85 CE (scholarly estimate) Read in Luke

2 Clement 6:1

Early Christian
1 But the Lord says, “No servant can serve two masters.” If we desire to serve both God and wealth, it is useless for us: 2 For what advantage is it, if a person gains the whole world and loses their soul? 3 Now this age and the age to come are two enemies. 4 One speaks of adultery and defilement and greed and deceit, but the other rejects these. 5 We therefore cannot be friends with both, but must reject the one and keep company with the other. 6 Let us consider that it is better to hate the things here, because they are lowly, short-lived, and perishable, and to love the things there, for they are good and imperishable.
130–160 CE (scholarly estimate) Read in 2 Clement

References

“... The saying in 2 Clem. 6. 1 can probably tell us little in the present context. Clearly, it is related in some way or other to the tradition in Matt. 6. 24 // Luke 16. 13, and in the first part of the saying, there is almost verbatim agreement between the versions. 2 Clement is slightly closer to the Lucan version in having οἰκέτης, which Matthew omits; but whether one can build very much on this is uncertain. The second part of the saying in 2 Clement is by no means as close verbally to the synoptic versions. There is the contrast between ‘serving God’ and ‘(serving) mammon’, but the structure of the sayings is different. Hence, at most there seems to be a common tradition underlying the versions here, but we cannot go further. In any case, it is not clear that in this part ‘Clement’ thinks that he is actually quoting as such. The use of the first person plural [...] may suggest rather that this is ‘Clement’s’ own gloss on, or interpretation of, the saying, rather than a continuation of the quotation of the saying of ‘the Lord’. ...”
Andrew Gregory and Christopher Tuckett, eds., The Reception of the New Testament in the Apostolic Fathers (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 267.

References are not endorsements of their contents. Read each reference in full to understand its author's intentions in using these texts.

Your feedback

Luke 16:13 and 2 Clement 6:1

Leave a comment

Your questions and comments are welcome!

Comments

Glossary

Search the Library