Texts in Conversation
In Luke 16, Jesus says no servant can serve two masters. In 2 Clement, the preacher repeats Luke's term for servant, then applies the saying to God and wealth; this may be his own explanation rather than part of the quotation.
Share:
2500 BCE
1000+ CE
Luke 16:13
New Testament
10 “The one who is faithful in a very little is also faithful in much, and the one who is dishonest in a very little is also dishonest in much. 11 If then you haven’t been trustworthy in handling worldly wealth, who will entrust you with the true riches? 12 And if you haven’t been trustworthy with someone else’s property, who will give you your own? 13 No servant can serve two masters, for either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and money.” 14 The Pharisees (who loved money) heard all this and ridiculed him.
2 Clement 6:1
Early Christian
1 But the Lord says, “No servant can serve two masters.” If we desire to serve both God and wealth, it is useless for us: 2 For what advantage is it, if a person gains the whole world and loses their soul? 3 Now this age and the age to come are two enemies. 4 One speaks of adultery and defilement and greed and deceit, but the other rejects these. 5 We therefore cannot be friends with both, but must reject the one and keep company with the other. 6 Let us consider that it is better to hate the things here, because they are lowly, short-lived, and perishable, and to love the things there, for they are good and imperishable.
Date: 130-160 C.E. (based on scholarly estimates)
Search:
Notes and References
“... The saying in 2 Clem. 6. 1 can probably tell us little in the present context. Clearly, it is related in some way or other to the tradition in Matt. 6. 24 // Luke 16. 13, and in the first part of the saying, there is almost verbatim agreement between the versions. 2 Clement is slightly closer to the Lucan version in having οἰκέτης, which Matthew omits; but whether one can build very much on this is uncertain. The second part of the saying in 2 Clement is by no means as close verbally to the synoptic versions. There is the contrast between ‘serving God’ and ‘(serving) mammon’, but the structure of the sayings is different. Hence, at most there seems to be a common tradition underlying the versions here, but we cannot go further. In any case, it is not clear that in this part ‘Clement’ thinks that he is actually quoting as such. The use of the first person plural [...] may suggest rather that this is ‘Clement’s’ own gloss on, or interpretation of, the saying, rather than a continuation of the quotation of the saying of ‘the Lord’. ...”
Gregory, Andrew F.
The Reception of the New Testament in the Apostolic Fathers
(p. 267) Oxford University Press, 2005
* The use of references are not endorsements of their contents. Please read the entirety of the provided reference(s) to understand the author's full intentions regarding the use of these texts.
Your Feedback:
Leave a Comment
Anonymous comments are welcome. All comments are subject to moderation.
1 && show(index - 1)"
@keydown.right.window="open && comments.length > 1 && show(index + 1)">
User Comments
,