Texts in Conversation

The Gospel of Philip applies 1 Corinthians' warning about sharing an altar to the killing of people as well as animals. Calling God a man-eater questions whether treating Jesus' death as a sacrifice amounts to serving a false god.
Share:
2500 BCE
1000+ CE

1 Corinthians 10:18

New Testament
16 Is not the cup of blessing that we bless a sharing in the blood of Christ? Is not the bread that we break a sharing in the body of Christ? 17 Because there is one bread, we who are many are one body, for we all share the one bread. 18 Look at the people of Israel. Are not those who eat the sacrifices partners in the altar? 19 Am I saying that idols or food sacrificed to them amount to anything? 20 No, I mean that what the pagans sacrifice is to demons and not to God. I do not want you to be partners with demons.
Date: 55-57 C.E. (based on scholarly estimates)

Gospel of Philip 6:36

Nag Hammadi
God is a Man-eater. Consequently, the Man was [sacrificed] to him. Before the Man had been sacrificed, animals were sacrificed, because those to whom they sacrificed were not gods. Glass vessels as well as pottery vessels come to be with fire. If, however, glass vessels get broken, they are refashioned, because they came to be with a breath. By contrast, if pottery vessels get broken, they are destroyed, because they came to be without breath. A donkey turned a millstone, finishing (the equivalent of) a hundred-mile walk. When it let loose, it found itself still in exactly the same place.
Date: 180-250 C.E. (based on scholarly estimates)
Search:

Notes and References

#7099
“... What does Paul mean when he warns against ‘‘Israel according to the flesh,” and connects this with a warning against idolatry in the Christian communion meal? Valentinian teachers offer various interpretations of the meal and of its elements. One interprets the bread as a symbol of “his body,” the ecclesia'** (cf. 6:17: “we, being many, are one bread, and one body’’). In the Marcosian sacrament, the wine symbolizes grace,’?” as the mingling of water and wine suggests the transformation of the human into the divine. The writer of the Gospel of Philip offers another interpretation: “his flesh is his logos, and his blood the holy spirit.’’'?* Valentinian teachers agree, however, that those who refer the bread and wine to Jesus’ sacrificial passion and death interpret the elements only psychically. The writer of the Gospel of Philip suggests ironically that “their God is a man-eater. Because of this they kill the man for him. Before they killed the man they were killing the animals. Those for whom they killed them are no gods.”’'?° Would not participation in such a psychic ‘‘sacrifice of the altar’ (10:18) involve the pneumatic in eating ‘'food offered to idols” (10:19), that is, to the demiurge and the cosmic archons? ...”
Pagels, Elaine Hiesey The Gnostic Paul: Gnostic Exegesis of the Pauline Letters (p. 73) Fortress Press, 1975

* The use of references are not endorsements of their contents. Please read the entirety of the provided reference(s) to understand the author's full intentions regarding the use of these texts.

Your Feedback:

Leave a Comment

Do you have questions or comments about these texts? Please submit them here.

Anonymous comments are welcome. All comments are subject to moderation.

User Comments

,

Find Similar Texts

Search by the same Books

Compare the same Text Groups

Go to Intertext