Texts in Conversation

Luke closes the patch and wineskin sayings he shares with Mark by adding that no one who has drunk old wine wants the new. The Gospel of Thomas has Luke's addition too, but puts it first and runs the whole set in reverse order.
Share:
2500 BCE
1000+ CE

Mark 2:21

New Testament
21 No one sews a patch of unshrunk cloth on an old garment; otherwise, the patch pulls away from it, the new from the old, and the tear becomes worse. 22 And no one pours new wine into old wineskins; otherwise, the wine will burst the skins, and both the wine and the skins will be destroyed. Instead new wine is poured into new wineskins.”
Date: 60-75 C.E. (based on scholarly estimates)

Luke 5:39

New Testament
36 He also told them a parable: “No one tears a patch from a new garment and sews it on an old garment. If he does, he will have torn the new, and the piece from the new will not match the old. 37 And no one pours new wine into old wineskins. If he does, the new wine will burst the skins and will be spilled, and the skins will be destroyed. 38 Instead new wine must be poured into new wineskins. 39 No one after drinking old wine wants the new, for he says, ‘The old is good enough.’”
Date: 75-85 C.E. (based on scholarly estimates)

Gospel of Thomas 1:47

Nag Hammadi
46 Jesus said, “From Adam to John the Baptist, among those born of women, no one is greater than John the Baptist so that his eyes should not be averted. Yet I have said that whoever among you will become a child will know the kingdom and will become greater than John.” 47 Jesus said, “It is impossible for a man to mount two horses or to stretch two bows; and it is impossible for a servant to serve two masters, for he will honor the one and treat the other contemptuously. No person drinks old wine and immediately desires to drink new wine. New wine is not put into old wineskins, or they might burst; and old wine is not put into a new wineskin, or it might spoil. An old patch is not sewn onto a new garment, because it would tear.” 48 Jesus said, “If two make peace with each other in a single house, they will say to the mountain, ‘Move from here,’ and it will move.”
Date: 90-130 C.E. (based on scholarly estimates)
Search:

Notes and References

#6596
“... The second half of CGT 47 contains the same two metaphors, but in reverse order, that is, moving from the metaphor of wine to the metaphor of the patch. The wording is as follows: No one drinks old wine and immediately desires to drink new wine; and they do not pour [literally, “throw”] new wine into old wineskins, lest they burst. And they do not pour old wine into a new wineskin lest it destroy it. They do not sew an old patch on a new garment, since there will be a tear. Two points strike one immediately: (1) Luke’s statement about not desiring new wine after drinking the older, preferable wine is most likely his own redactional addition. It does not fit the rest of the metaphor about new wine and old wineskins, but it does fit the whole problematic about the relation of the old and the new in salvation history that Luke first sounds in his Gospel and then works out in the early history of the church in the Acts of the Apostles. Not surprisingly, the new material is simply tacked on to the end of the pericope, the common place for adding new and somewhat extraneous material to a traditional unit. Since everything else in these verses is material of the triple tradition (i.e., coming from Mark), any attempt to invent a special L tradition simply for this last sentence looks forced, if not desperate. What would be its theological meaning as an isolated logion in the L tradition? And by what strange coincidence do both Luke and Thomas locate the isolated logion in the same unit: the combined metaphors of wine and patch? Once one grants that the final sentence in Luke 5:36–39 is a Lucan creation, its presence in Thomas inevitably leads to the conclusion that Thomas knew at least the Lucan form of the pericope. As we have seen already and shall see again later, this is not the only time in the CGT that the author/compiler shows a preference for Luke within the triple tradition. (2) Once we conclude that Thomas is working with the Lucan form of the double metaphors, we see that his procedure of taking up the metaphors in reverse order is thoroughgoing and complete: first the saying about preferring the old wine, next the saying about not pouring new wine into old wineskins, and finally the saying about the patch. ...”

* The use of references are not endorsements of their contents. Please read the entirety of the provided reference(s) to understand the author's full intentions regarding the use of these texts.

Your Feedback:

Leave a Comment

Do you have questions or comments about these texts? Please submit them here.

Anonymous comments are welcome. All comments are subject to moderation.

User Comments

,

Go to Intertext