Texts in Conversation
2 Kings 25 describes the temple items being destroyed during Babylon’s attack, but 2 Chronicles 36 says they were taken to Babylon unharmed. This was likely changed to protect the honor of God and Israel, following Mesopotamian traditions that these sacred objects represented the deity.
Share:
2 Kings 25:13
Hebrew Bible
11 Nebuzaradan, the captain of the royal guard, deported the rest of the people who were left in the city, those who had deserted to the king of Babylon, and the rest of the craftsmen. 12 But he left behind some of the poor of the land and gave them fields and vineyards. 13 The Babylonians broke the two bronze pillars in the Lord’s temple, as well as the movable stands and the big bronze basin called “The Sea.” They took the bronze to Babylon. 14 They also took the pots, shovels, trimming shears, pans, and all the bronze utensils used by the priests.
Date: 6th Century B.C.E. (Final composition) (based on scholarly estimates)
Source
2 Chronicles 36:7
Hebrew Bible
5 Jehoiakim was twenty-five years old when he became king, and he reigned for eleven years in Jerusalem. He did evil in the sight of the Lord his God. 6 King Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon attacked him, bound him with bronze chains, and carried him away to Babylon. 7 Nebuchadnezzar took some of the items in the Lord’s temple to Babylon and put them in his palace there. 8 The rest of the events of Jehoiakim’s reign, including the horrible sins he committed and his shortcomings, are recorded in the Scroll of the Kings of Israel and Judah. His son Jehoiachin replaced him as king.
Date: 4th Century B.C.E. (based on scholarly estimates)
Source
Search:
Notes and References
"... In Mesopotamian belief, at least as injurious to a community’s relationship with its divine patron as the desecration of the principal temple was the destruction or abduction of the deity’s image. The divine image was not considered an imagined portrayal of its subject, but actually to be or contain the god. In the ritual carried out in Babylon to induct a cult statue, the statue is itself repeatedly designated ‘the god’. Deutero-Isaiah adopts the same perspective in Isaiah 46:1–2: the images of Marduk and Nabû are the gods, discomfited and ridiculous in their helplessness. The Jerusalem temple held no image of Yahweh, but it did possess objects suggestive of his divinity and presence. Nebuchadnezzar transferred these objects to Babylon in three stages (2 Kings 24:13, 25:13–17; Jeremiah 27:16–22, 52:17–23; 2 Chronicles 36:7, 10, 18; Ezra 1:7–11; Daniel 1:2; compare Daniel 5:2–4). The Chronicler is at pains to state that all the vessels of the temple were taken there and none was cut into pieces. With this contention, and his downplaying of other data, he departs from the Kings account. His version draws considerably on Jeremiah’s narrative (Jeremiah 27:19–22; 28:1–11) ..."
Baker, Robin
Mesopotamian Civilization and the Origins of the New Testament
(p. 41) Cambridge University Press, 2022
* The use of references are not endorsements of their contents. Please read the entirety of the provided reference(s) to understand the author's full intentions regarding the use of these texts.
Your Feedback:
Leave a Comment
Anonymous comments are welcome. All comments are subject to moderation.