Texts in Conversation
Deuteronomy’s command not to add or subtract from it echoes Neo-Assyrian treaties like Esarhaddon’s, which forbid altering the written oath. Both stress that a covenant is permanent and that the written document remains binding for future generations.
Share:
2500 BCE
1000+ CE
Deuteronomy 12:32
Hebrew Bible
30 After they have been destroyed from your presence, be careful not to be ensnared like they are; do not inquire* of their gods and say, “How do these nations serve their gods? I will do the same.” 31 You must not worship the Lord your God the way they do! For everything that is abhorrent to him, everything he hates, they have done when worshiping their gods. They even burn up their sons and daughters before their gods! 32 (13:1) You must be careful to do everything I am commanding you. Do not add to it or subtract from it!
Date: 750–400 BCE (based on scholarly estimates)
The Vassal Treaties of Esarhaddon 1:397-409
Esarhaddon's Succession Treaty (SAA 2 6)
Ancient Near East, Assyrian
397 Whoever changes, disregards, transgresses or erases the oaths of this tablet or [dis]regards... this treaty and transgresses its oath, [may the guardian(s) of] this treaty tablet, [Aššur], king of the gods, and the great gods, my lords, [......] the statue of Esarhaddon, king of Assyria, or the statue of Assurbanipal, the great crown prince designate, or the statue of [his] b[rother......] the seal of the [great] ru[ler, father] of the gods, [......]. You shall guard [this treaty tablet which] is sealed with the seal of Aššur, king of the gods, and set up in your presence, like your own god.
Date: 672 BCE (based on scholarly estimates)
Search:
Notes and References
"... In addition to making an oath effectual and divinely enforced, writing the oath down also meant that it would endure through time without losing power of efficacy. A neo-Assyrian loyalty oath would use language indicating that the vassal commitment to the suzerain is everlasting: “Never to break the adê which is henceforth valid for ever” (VTE 377-384:33) for all generations of the vassals “who will exist in days to come after the treaty”. Due to the material efficaciousness of individual instantiations of loyalty oaths, as documents they often included prohibitions against alteration of the writing. The Esarhaddon and Aramaic Sefire treaties alike establish an injunction to never alter or destroy the physical document, which Deuteronomy 13:1 echoes in order to portray the covenant as unchangeable and permanent: “You must diligently observe everything that I command you; do not add to it or take anything from it.” Deuteronomy 4:2 also states, “You must neither add anything to what I command you nor take away anything from it.” Bernard M. Levinson reminds that “The formula [in Deuteronomy 13:1] actually has a long pre-history in the ancient Near East, where it originally sought to prevent royal inscriptions, including law collections and treaties (compare 1 Maccabees 8:30) from being altered.” ..."
Lisa Joann Cleath, “Reading Ceremonies in the Hebrew Bible: Ideologies of Textual Authority in Joshua 8, 2 Kings 22–23, and Nehemiah 8” (diss., George Fox University, 2016), 37.
* The use of references are not endorsements of their contents. Please read the entirety of the provided reference(s) to understand the author's full intentions regarding the use of these texts.
Your Feedback:
Leave a Comment
Anonymous comments are welcome. All comments are subject to moderation.
1 && show(index - 1)"
@keydown.right.window="open && comments.length > 1 && show(index + 1)">
User Comments
,