“... In 1 Enoch (or the Ethiopic Enoch) 91:18-19, a contrast is drawn between the ways of righteousness and the ways of wickedness: And now I tell you, my children, and I show you the paths of righteousness and the paths of wrong-doing; I will show them to you again, that you may know what will come to pass. And now, hearken unto me, my children, and walk in the paths of righteousness, and walk not in the paths of wrong-doing; for all who walk in the paths of oppression shall perish everlastingly. [...] So far, we have seen the Two Ways metaphor couched within polar tendencies of good and evil, moral and immoral qualities, and righteous and wicked people. This dualism refers to a pattern of thought which expresses two mutually exclusive categories and, as such, stresses the importance on the part of man of making a fundamental choice between right and wrong. In this respect, these cases reflect the Two Ways in our Greek document and the material is extensive enough to suggest that the Two Ways instruction flourished in circles fostering these dualistic traditions. Yet, in the above instances the points of agreement with the Greek Two Ways are almost completely limited to the opening words of our document. They do not provide an unambiguous example of the metaphor serving as a framework upon which catalogues of virtues and vices are constructed. ...”